Effects of new acidification methods on nitrogen conversion during agricultural waste composting

ZHANG Lu; WANG Hongge; WANG Weishuai; WANG Xuan; GUO Weiting; LIU Shuang; WANG Hong; MA Lin

doi:10.12357/cjea.20220746

Volume 31 Issue 5

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2023 > 31(5): 796-806

ZHANG L, WANG H G, WANG W S, WANG X, GUO W T, LIU S, WANG H, MA L. Effects of new acidification methods on nitrogen conversion during agricultural waste composting[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(5): 796−806 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220746

Citation:

PDF( 4534 KB)

Effects of new acidification methods on nitrogen conversion during agricultural waste composting

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220746

ZHANG Lu^{1, 2
,},
WANG Hongge^{1, 2},
WANG Weishuai¹,
WANG Xuan^{1, 3},
GUO Weiting⁴,
LIU Shuang⁵,
WANG Hong⁵,
MA Lin^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences / Hebei Key Laboratory of Soil Ecology / Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050022, China
2.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3.
Xiong’an Innovation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiong’an 071700, China
4.
Shijiazhuang Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Station, Shijiazhuang 050030, China
5.
Hebei Provincial Animal Husbandry Station, Shijiazhuang 050030, China

Funds: This study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province (20373806D), the Science and Technology Service Network Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-QYZD-160), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021095), Hebei Province Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System Dairy Cow Industry Innovation Team Project (HBCT2018120206), and Hebei Province Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System Egg Broiler Industry Innovation Team Project (HBCT2018150209).

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: malin1979@sjziam.ac.cn
Received Date: 2022-09-28
Accepted Date: 2022-11-03

Available Online: 2022-11-25

Publish Date: 2023-05-10

Abstract

Abstract

Aerobic composting is a common method for treating agricultural waste. However, a large amount of nitrogen is lost during composting, which is an important problem in agricultural waste composting. Material acidification is an effective method to reduce nitrogen loss during composting, while conventional acidification using inorganic acids has disadvantages such as high cost and secondary pollution. Optimizing the acidification process is of great significance for reducing nutrient loss and environmental pollution during composting. In this study, an acid conditioner was prepared by anaerobic fermentation of lactic acid bacteria with food residues (apple pomace and soybean dregs) as substrates, which were rich in lactic acid (70 mmol·L⁻¹) and lactic acid bacteria (10⁶ cfu·mL⁻¹). Two acidizing methods were designed using the acid conditioner: 1) A certain amount of acid conditioner (30%, w/w) was added directly to acidify the material (MA); 2) a small amount of acid conditioner (3%, w/w) was added with no forced ventilation for the first 3 days of composting to enable the lactic acid bacteria under the acidic conditioners to produce lactic acid achieving self-acidification of compost materials (LA). Meanwhile, we set up two experimental treatments consisting of adding sulfuric acid (SA) and no acidification (CK). Changes in physicochemical properties (temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, germination index of Oenanthe javanica treated with different composts, contents of organic matter and total nitrogen) and treansformation of nitrogen forms (emissions of NH₃ and N₂O; contents of organic nitrogen, NH₄⁺-N, NO₂⁻-N, and NO₃⁻-N) during the composting of agricultural waste were analyzed. The results showed that the compost products treated by the three acidification methods all reached the maturity standard (germination index > 80%), and the MA treatment was the best (germination index = 117.8%). The duration of the thermophilic phases (> 50 ℃) of CK, MA, SA, and LA were 10, 10, 9, and 7 days, respectively, all of which reached the harmless standard (> 50 ℃ for at least 7 days). The total nitrogen losses of MA, SA, and LA decreased by 14.0%, 25.6%, and 22.2%, and NH₃ volatilization decreased by 26.0%, 36.5%, and 54.9%, compared with CK, respectively. The acidification treatments increased the NH₄⁺-N content, promoted nitrification, and indirectly enhanced denitrification. MA and LA treatments reduced N₂O emissions by 23.1% and 69.4%, respectively, whereas SA treatment inhibited N₂O reduction and increased N₂O emissions by 18.3%. The ReCiPe evaluation method was used to evaluate the total environmental burden of different acidification treatments. The total environmental burden of MA, SA, and LA decreased by 34.5%, 11.0%, and 55.9%, respectively, compared with that of CK, indicating that acidification is an effective way to reduce the environmental burden of composting. By comparing the economic benefits of the three acidifying methods, it was found that the costs of MA and LA treatments were 18.4 Yuan and 0.87 Yuan, respectively, for reducing the emission of 1 kg active nitrogen, which was far lower than that of SA treatment at 91.3 Yuan. These results indicate that MA and LA acidification methods are economically feasible. In conclusion, MA and LA treatments can be feasible methods to reduce nitrogen loss during composting. This study provides a new theoretical basis for composting acidification and nitrogen conservation technology as well as a new scheme for the collaborative treatment of multi-source waste.
- Composting,
- Agricultural waste,
- Nitrogen transformation,
- Nitrogen loss,
- Acidification

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	CUI X H, GUO L Y, LI C H, et al. The total biomass nitrogen reservoir and its potential of replacing chemical fertilizers in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 135: 110215 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110215
[2]	WANG Q, WANG Z, AWASTHI M K, et al. Evaluation of medical stone amendment for the reduction of nitrogen loss and bioavailability of heavy metals during pig manure composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 220: 297−304 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.081
[3]	CAO Y B, WANG X, BAI Z H, et al. Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions during solid waste composting with different additives: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235: 626−635 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.288
[4]	LU Y S, GU W J, XU P Z, et al. Effects of sulphur and Thiobacillus thioparus 1904 on nitrogen cycle genes during chicken manure aerobic composting[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 80: 10−16 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.050
[5]	CAO Y B, WANG X, LIU L, et al. Acidification of manure reduces gaseous emissions and nutrient losses from subsequent composting process[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 264: 110454 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110454
[6]	SHAN G C, LI W G, GAO Y J, et al. Additives for reducing nitrogen loss during composting: a review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 307: 127308 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127308
[7]	PAN J T, CAI H Z, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Comparative evaluation of the use of acidic additives on sewage sludge composting quality improvement, nitrogen conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 270: 467−475 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.050
[8]	WU J, HE S Z, LIANG Y, et al. Effect of phosphate additive on the nitrogen transformation during pig manure composting[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(21): 17760−17768 doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9285-x
[9]	MAO H, ZHANG T, LI R, et al. Apple pomace improves the quality of pig manure aerobic compost by reducing emissions of NH₃ and N₂O[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 870 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00987-y
[10]	程志翔. 食品加工制造企业固体废弃物处置分析[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2019 CHENG Z X. Analysis of solid waste disposal in food processing and manufacturing enterprises[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Ocean University, 2019
[11]	GEZAE DAFUL A, GÖRGENS J F. Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of lignocellulosic lactic acid production[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 162: 53−65 doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.12.054
[12]	曹玉博, 张陆, 王选, 等. 畜禽废弃物堆肥氨气与温室气体协同减排研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 923−932 doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0104 CAO Y B, ZHANG L, WANG X, et al. Synergistic mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during livestock waste composting[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 923−932 doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0104
[13]	ZHANG J M, BU Y S, ZHANG C C, et al. Development of a low-cost and high-efficiency culture medium for bacteriocin lac-B23 production by Lactobacillus plantarum J23[J]. Biology, 2020, 9(7): 171 doi: 10.3390/biology9070171
[14]	WANG X, BAI Z H, YAO Y, et al. Composting with negative pressure aeration for the mitigation of ammonia emissions and global warming potential[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 195: 448−457 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.146
[15]	ZHAO Y, ZHAO Y, ZHANG Z C, et al. Effect of thermo-tolerant actinomycetes inoculation on cellulose degradation and the formation of humic substances during composting[J]. Waste Management, 2017, 68: 64−73 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.022
[16]	BERNAL M P, ALBURQUERQUE J A, MORAL R. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(22): 5444−5453 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
[17]	HUIJBREGTS M A J, STEINMANN Z J N, ELSHOUT P M F, et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22(2): 138−147 doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y
[18]	ELWELL D L, HONG J H, KEENER H M. Composting hog manure/sawdust mixtures using intermittent and continuous aeration: ammonia emissions[J]. Compost Science & Utilization, 2002, 10(2): 142−149
[19]	GU W J, ZHANG F B, XU P Z, et al. Effects of sulphur and Thiobacillus thioparus on cow manure aerobic composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(11): 6529−6535 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.049
[20]	FANGUEIRO D, HJORTH M, GIOELLI F. Acidification of animal slurry— A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 149: 46−56
[21]	GARCÍA C, HERNÁNDEZ T, COSTA F. Study on water extract of sewage sludge composts[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1991, 37(3): 399−408 doi: 10.1080/00380768.1991.10415052
[22]	常瑞雪, 王骞, 甘晶晶, 等. 易降解有机质含量对黄瓜秧堆肥腐熟和氮损失的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1): 231−237 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.032 CHANG R X, WANG Q, GAN J J, et al. Influence of easily-degraded organic matter content on maturity and nitrogen loss during composting of cucumber vine[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(1): 231−237 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.032
[23]	LI R H, WANG Q, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Nutrient transformation during aerobic composting of pig manure with biochar prepared at different temperatures[J]. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(7): 815−826 doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.963692
[24]	NIE E Q, GAO D, ZHENG G D. Effects of lactic acid on modulating the ammonia emissions in co-composts of poultry litter with slaughter sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 315: 123812 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123812
[25]	FUKUMOTO Y, SUZUKI K, KURODA K, et al. Effects of struvite formation and nitratation promotion on nitrogenous emissions such as NH₃, N₂O and NO during swine manure composting[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(2): 1468−1474 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.089
[26]	JIANG J S, HUANG Y M, LIU X L, et al. The effects of apple pomace, bentonite and calcium superphosphate on swine manure aerobic composting[J]. Waste Management, 2014, 34(9): 1595−1602 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.002
[27]	赵梦竹, 潘燕辉, 马金珠, 等. 餐厨垃圾和污泥联合好氧堆肥中的氮素转化及损失[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(3): 301−306, 312 ZHAO M Z, PAN Y H, MA J Z, et al. Nitrogen transformation and loss during the co-composting of food waste and sludge[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 52(3): 301−306, 312
[28]	CHEN M L, HUANG Y M, LIU H J, et al. Impact of different nitrogen source on the compost quality and greenhouse gas emissions during composting of garden waste[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 124: 326−335 doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.03.006
[29]	YANG F, LI G X, SHI H, et al. Effects of phosphogypsum and superphosphate on compost maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting[J]. Waste Management, 2015, 36: 70−76 doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.012