| Citation: |
GUO C N, YU F W, ZHANG W H. Methods and application of accounting of farmland ecosystem services: Based on the perspective of the intersection of ecology and economics[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2025, 33(9): 1−12. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20240747
|
Accounting for the value of farmland ecosystem services serves as the theoretical basis for formulating policies on agricultural ecological protection compensation and ecological damage compensation and is the foundation for promoting the realization of the value of agricultural ecological products. From the interdisciplinary perspective of ecology and economics, this study attempted to integrate ecological accounting with economic accounting, thereby constructing a method to account for the value of farmland ecosystem services. Moreover, we studied the changing characteristics of the value of farmland ecosystem services in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2000 to 2022. The results are as follows: 1) From 2000 to 2022, the average annual value of farmland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region was 5.21×1011 ¥, equivalent to 79.70% of the average annual regional GDP and 11.02 times the average annual value of provision services. 2) Among the primary indicators, the value of reconciliation services accounted for the largest proportion (38.32 %) of the total value. Social security services ranked second (35.92%). Cultural services, provision services, and negative value accounted for 16.52%, 9.04%, and 0.19%, respectively. 3) Calculating the agricultural subsidy standard based on the amount that farmers should have received, however, did not receive from the total value of farmland ecosystem services, the subsidy standard per hectare of farmland in Inner Mongolia should be 51 293 ¥, which is notably higher than the current government subsidy standard of 2 250 ¥·hm−2. The conclusions of this study imply the following policy implications: First, it is necessary to continuously explore more scientific methods for evaluating the value of farmland ecosystem services to understand the inventory and value of the farmland ecosystem. Second, it is essential to establish and improve farmland ecological protection mechanisms based on value accounting and to scientifically formulate agricultural subsidy standards. In Inner Mongolia, agricultural subsidy standards should be raised. Third, based on the ecological service values of different crops, the subsidy standards for different crops should be explored such that farmers can receive fairer and more reasonable compensation or subsidies when facing land expropriation or engaging in agricultural planting.
| [1] |
DAILY G C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997
|
| [2] |
COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253−260 doi: 10.1038/387253a0
|
| [3] |
United Nations. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Central Framework[R]. New York: United Nations, 2014
|
| [4] |
赵庆忠. 生态文明看聊城[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2012
ZHAO Q Z. Viewing Liaocheng from Ecological Civilization[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2012
|
| [5] |
欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747−6761 doi: 10.5846/stxb201310092428
OUYANG Z Y, ZHU C Q, YANG G B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747−6761 doi: 10.5846/stxb201310092428
|
| [6] |
United Nations. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 — Central Framework[M]. New York: United Nation, 2014
|
| [7] |
谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740−1746
XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG C S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740−1746
|
| [8] |
於方, 杨威杉, 马国霞, 等. 生态价值核算的国内外最新进展与展望[J]. 环境保护, 2020, 48(14): 18−24
YU F, YANG W S, MA G X, et al. The latest development and prospect of ecological value accounting at home and abroad[J]. Environmental Protection, 2020, 48(14): 18−24
|
| [9] |
惠欣欣, 许宪春, 朱莉. 生态产品价值核算研究综述及问题与对策建议[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(7): 13−28
HUI X X, XU X C, ZHU L. Ecological product value accounting: Review, problems and countermeasures[J]. Statistical Research, 2024, 41(7): 13−28
|
| [10] |
谢高地, 肖玉. 农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(6): 645−651 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00645
XIE G D, XIAO Y. Review of agro-ecosystem services and their values[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(6): 645−651 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00645
|
| [11] |
谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911−919 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019
XIE G D, ZHEN L, LU C X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911−919 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2008.05.019
|
| [12] |
胡晓燕, 于法稳, 徐湘博, 等. 农田生态系统服务价值核算: 指标体系构建及应用研究[J]. 生态经济, 2023, 39(4): 111−121
HU X Y, YU F W, XU X B, et al. Accounting of cropland ecosystem services: Indicator system construction and its application[J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(4): 111−121
|
| [13] |
内蒙古自治区研究室, 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院. 内蒙古生态系统功能价值评估[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 2019
Research Laboratory of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences. Assessment of Ecosystem Function Value in Inner Mongolia[M]. Beijing: China Development Press, 2019
|
| [14] |
内蒙古自治区研究室, 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 等. 内蒙古生态产品总值(GEP)核算报告[M]. 北京: 中国发展出版社, 2021
Research Laboratory of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences. Accounting Report of Gross Ecological Product (GEP) in Inner Mongolia[M]. Beijing: China Development Press, 2021
|
| [15] |
何文清, 陈源泉, 高旺盛, 等. 农牧交错带风蚀沙化区农业生态系统服务功能的经济价值评估[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(3): 49−53 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2004.03.011
HE W Q, CHEN Y Q, GAO W S, et al. Economic value of agroecosystem service in typical wind-erosion region of transition zone between agriculture and pasture[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(3): 49−53 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2004.03.011
|
| [16] |
董孝斌, 刘平辉, 高旺盛. 从县域尺度的生态系统服务看农牧交错带的生态建设与结构调整[J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(5): 780−784 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-694X.2005.05.027
DONG X B, LIU P H, GAO W S. Ecological construction and agricultural structure adjustment for ecotone between agriculture and pasture in North China: A case study of ecosystem service in county scale[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(5): 780−784 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-694X.2005.05.027
|
| [17] |
红霞. 内蒙古秸秆资源产量及其饲料化利用潜力[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(11): 2927−2936 doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0846
HONG X. Straw yield and potential utilization for forage in Inner Mongolia[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(11): 2927−2936 doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2022-0846
|
| [18] |
吕智超, 孙日丹, 洪小丽, 等. 吉林省农作物秸秆资源现状及利用对策[J]. 东北农业科学, 2024, 49(4): 62−65
LYU Z C, SUN R D, HONG X L, et al. Present situation and utilization countermeasures of maize straw resources in Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 49(4): 62−65
|
| [19] |
王泽昊, 姚健, 孙豪. 城乡收入差距、消费倾向与消费结构升级[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(15): 51−54
WANG Z H, YAO J, SUN H. Urban-rural income gap, consumption propensity and consumption structure upgrading[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2022, 38(15): 51−54
|
| [20] |
白玮, 邱爱军, 张秋平, 等. 黄淮海地区水土资源粮食安全价值核算[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2010, 20(1): 66−70 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.01.012
BAI W, QIU A J, ZHANG Q P, et al. Grain security value estimation of land and water resources in Huang-Huai-Hai Region[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010, 20(1): 66−70 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2010.01.012
|
| [21] |
吴浩玮, 孙小淇, 梁博文, 等. 我国畜禽粪便污染现状及处理与资源化利用分析[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(6): 1168−1176 doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0218
WU H W, SUN X Q, LIANG B W, et al. Analysis of livestock and poultry manure pollution in China and its treatment and resource utilization[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(6): 1168−1176 doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0218
|
| [22] |
刘利花, 尹昌斌, 钱小平. 稻田资源价值体系构建及价值评估−以南京市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015, 36(2): 29−37 doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20150205
LIU L H, YIN C B, QIAN X P. Construction of value system of paddy resources and its value evaluation — Taking Nanjing as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2015, 36(2): 29−37 doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20150205
|
| [23] |
赵琦, 秦富仓, 张恒, 等. 内蒙古黄土高原土壤侵蚀时空分布特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2024, 44(5): 82−92
ZHAO Q, QIN F C, ZHANG H, et al. Characterization of spatial and temporal distribution of soil erosion on the Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia and analysis of its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2024, 44(5): 82−92
|
| [24] |
乔宇鑫, 朱华忠, 钟华平, 等. 内蒙古地区草地表层土壤容重空间格局分析[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 793−801
QIAO Y X, ZHU H Z, ZHONG H P, et al. Spatial pattern analysis on the soil bulk density of grassland in Inner Mongolia autonomous region, China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(4): 793−801
|
| [25] |
张娜. 陕西省农田生态系统服务价值评估及其空间规划建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2024, 45(6): 244−253
ZHANG N. Service value evaluation of farmland ecosystem services and suggestions for spatial planning in Shaanxi province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024, 45(6): 244−253
|
| [26] |
孙悦超. 内蒙古后山地区不同地表覆盖条件下土壤抗风蚀效应测试研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2008
SUN Y C. Test research on soil resistance to wind erosion effect in the different surface coverage in Houshan Area of Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2008
|
| [27] |
任昱, 魏春光, 王彦广, 等. 鄂尔多斯黄河流域荒漠生态系统防风固沙的功能价值评估[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2024, 15(7): 22−25, 29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8646.2024.07.006
REN Y, WEI C G, WANG Y G, et al. Evaluation of the function value of the desert ecosystem in the Yellow River Basin of Erdos[J]. Heilongjiang Science, 2024, 15(7): 22−25, 29 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8646.2024.07.006
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: