戴爱梅, 欧阳春华, 郭永旺, 赵志强, 古丽扎提. 直线形围栏陷阱系统对玉米地鼠情的监测效果[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 918-925.
引用本文: 戴爱梅, 欧阳春华, 郭永旺, 赵志强, 古丽扎提. 直线形围栏陷阱系统对玉米地鼠情的监测效果[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2016, 24(7): 918-925.
DAI Aimei, OUYANG Chunhua, GUO Yongwang, ZHAO Zhiqiang, GULIZHATI3. Monitoring rodents with linear trap-barrier system in corn fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 918-925.
Citation: DAI Aimei, OUYANG Chunhua, GUO Yongwang, ZHAO Zhiqiang, GULIZHATI3. Monitoring rodents with linear trap-barrier system in corn fields[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(7): 918-925.

直线形围栏陷阱系统对玉米地鼠情的监测效果

Monitoring rodents with linear trap-barrier system in corn fields

  • 摘要: 围栏陷阱(trap-barrier system, TBS)技术自2008年起在我国许多省市进行应用性试验和推广, 已有的研究多是注重防治效果, 虽有多位作者设想该技术还可用于鼠情监测, 但尚少见针对性试验和全面的数据支持。为研究直线形围栏陷阱系统(linear trap-barrier system, L-TBS)用于农田鼠情监测的科学依据, 探索L-TBS所获鼠情资料与常规性夹夜法的对应关系, 2015年5—10月在新疆博乐市玉米地进行了两种方法监测效果的对比试验。通过同一区域、不同地点、操作方式一致的3组重复试验, L-TBS监测的农田害鼠种类、种群数量动态与繁殖特征, 皆与夹夜法结果吻合: 鼠种组成百分比卡方检验, 小家鼠x2=1.50, 灰仓鼠x2=0.54, 均小于X20.01; 两种方法的繁殖特征相关性检测, 性比r=0.710 0, 怀孕率r=0.926 8, 睾丸下降率r=0.869 2, 繁殖指数r=0.940 0, 均显著正相关。而L-TBS因能捕获幼体而更全面反映种群年龄结构; L-TBS还能捕获夹夜法难以捕获的鼩鼱, 可用于防疫监测。由L-TBS法(X)与夹夜法(Y)获得的优势种小家鼠捕获率极显著正相关, 回归方程y=0.143 1+0.146 5x (d.f.=42, r=0.707 7, P=0.000 0), 展示了其与夹夜法的关联性。研究证明: 在 6.67 hm2农田边设置60 m长的L-TBS可以达到鼠害防治与监测的目的, 比常规夹夜法具更省工、省力、安全, 具有可操作性强的优点; 而L-TBS比矩形TBS更便于机械化农事操作, 适于农田推广应用。

     

    Abstract: The trap-barrier system (TBS) method has been used extensively in agricultural systems for trapping rodents in China because it is highly effective in preventing and controlling rodents with high capture rate, long and consistent control period and poses no harm to people and livestock as well as predators. Many researchers also have recommended the use of TBS in monitoring rodents due to its ability to capture rodents. In order to test the effects of TBS rodent monitoring, we set line trap-barrier system (L-TBS) and night snap-trap (NST, national industry standard of NY/T 1481—2007 ) systems from May to October 2015 to trap rodents in the corn fields of Boertala Mongolia Autonomous County, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the scientific evidence of the application of L-TBS in field rodent surveillance and to explore the corresponding relations between rodent community collected by L-TBS and by NST. Three replications were carried out at different sites in the same region using the same operation mode. The rodent community structure and population structure of dominant rodent species, including population dynamics and reproduction characteristics of captured rodent species were analyzed. The results certified the relevance of rodent species, and population structure and reproduction characters of rodent community between two methods. Firstly, Chi-Square test on rodent species composition captured by the L-TBS and NTS showed no statistically significant differences (χ2 = 3.31, P = 0.35). The percentage of dominant species of rodent composition was also not statistically significantly different (Mus musculus: χ2 = 1.50, P = 0.44; Cricetulus migratorius: χ2 = 0.54, P = 0.63). Secondly, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the abundance of the dominant species house mouse (Mus musculus) captured by L-TBS and NST (y = 0.143 1 + 0.146 5x, r = 0.707 7, P = 0.000 0). Meanwhile, the reproduction parameters of dominant species (Mus musculus) trapped by the two methods also had statistically significant positive correlation (sex ratio, r = 0.71; pregnancy rate, r = 0.926 8; percent male with prominent testicle, r = 0.869 2; reproduction index, r = 0.94). What is more, analysis of the age structure of the capture rodent species showed that L-TBS trapped more juvenile rodents than NST. L-TBS captured five groups of rodents with different age classes (juvenile, sub-adult, adult I, adult II and old-age classes), which fully reflected the age structure of rodent population in the region. Thus L-TBS more accurately reflected the population dynamics of field rodents in the study area. L-TBS captured some species of Soricidae (e.g., Sorex minutus) which were demanded to be monitored by the Epidemic Prevention Department of the government, but were hardly captured by NST method. Therefore, it was concluded that L-TBS method was applicable in preventing, controlling and monitoring over-ground rodent communities. It was necessary to set up 60 m long L-TBS system in the farm field of 6.67 hm-2. Compared with NST method, L-TBS method saved time and labor cost. It was also safer and easier to operate, particularly applicable in remote areas that lacked monitoring personnel and traffic. In addition, it was possible to arrange L-TBS alongside fields, which was suitable for mechanized farming operations. Therefore, L-TBS had a promising prospect for wilder applications in monitoring field rodents. However, L-TBS method captured less proportion of Rattus norvegicus than NST method (χ2 = 9.54 > χ20.01 = 9.21, P = 0.004 5). This was because Rattus norvegicus shied away from new objects and jumped over traps due to their larger size. There was therefore need for improvement of the traps of L-TBS.

     

/

返回文章
返回