高延军. 河南省新型农业现代化服务组织体系评价及其空间分布规律研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2017, 25(7): 1090-1098. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161097
引用本文: 高延军. 河南省新型农业现代化服务组织体系评价及其空间分布规律研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2017, 25(7): 1090-1098. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161097
GAO Yanjun. Evaluation on the system of service organization for new agricultural modernization in Henan Province and its rules of spatial distribution[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(7): 1090-1098. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161097
Citation: GAO Yanjun. Evaluation on the system of service organization for new agricultural modernization in Henan Province and its rules of spatial distribution[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(7): 1090-1098. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.161097

河南省新型农业现代化服务组织体系评价及其空间分布规律研究

Evaluation on the system of service organization for new agricultural modernization in Henan Province and its rules of spatial distribution

  • 摘要: 基于2014年中央提出的农业发展“三个导向”要求,本文构建了由土地流转、资源配置、信息服务、产业管理“四大组织”构成的新型农业现代化服务组织体系评价模型,以河南省18个市为基本单元,对服务组织体系的综合发展水平进行了评价,并探讨了空间分布规律。结果表明:河南省新型农业现代化服务组织体系整体发展水平较低,进入Ⅰ、Ⅱ类地区的只有3个市(郑州、济源、漯河),其余15个市集中在Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ类地区。空间分布有一定规律,豫西整体水平较高,洛阳、济源、焦作、三门峡都在Ⅱ或Ⅲ类地区;其次为豫中,郑州、漯河分别进入Ⅰ、Ⅱ类地区,但许昌、平顶山均在Ⅴ类地区;再次为豫北,鹤壁进入Ⅲ类地区,新乡、安阳、濮阳却停留在Ⅳ、Ⅴ类地区;然后为豫南,南阳、信阳、驻马店都处于Ⅴ类地区;最后为豫东,商丘、周口均为Ⅵ类地区,开封也只进入Ⅳ类地区。研究表明,河南省应构建完善的新型农业现代化服务组织体系,引导农地规模化流转,提高生产经营组织化程度,推进农业发展方式转变,保障农产品质量数量安全,这是加快农业现代化发展的必然选择。

     

    Abstract: Based on the requirements of agricultural development in line with the"Three Orientations"strategy presented by China's Central Government in 2014, an evaluation index system on the system of service organization for new agricultural modernization were established.With Henan Province as the case study, the paper explored the development level and the rules of spatial distribution of service organization system, aiming to provide references for its further improvement.The index system was consisted of 16 indexes included in 4 criteria layers, which were development indexes of rural land circulation organization, resources allocation organization, information service organization and industrial management organization.Then using 18 cites in Henan Province as the basic units, the comprehensive development level of service organization system, and the related rules of spatial distribution were determined.The results showed that the comprehensive development level of service organization system was low in Henan Province.Only Zhengzhou, Jiyuan and Luohe were in District Ⅰ and Ⅱ, and all the other 15 cities were in District Ⅲ, Ⅳ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ.The rules of spatial distribution of the 18 cities were regular.The development in western Henan was the highest, which included Luoyang, Jiyuan, Jiaozuo and Sanmenxia, all of which occurred under District Ⅱ or Ⅲ.The development in the central part ranked the second, where Zhengzhou and Luohe occurred under District Ⅰ or Ⅱ, while both Xuchang and Pingdingshan occurred under District Ⅴ.The development in the northern part ranked the third, where Hebi occurred under District Ⅲ and then Xinxiang, Anyang and Puyang all were under District Ⅳ or Ⅴ.The development in the southern part ranked fourth, where Nanyang, Xinyang and Zhumadian were under District Ⅴ.The development in the eastern part was the lowest, where both Shangqiu and Zhoukou were in District Ⅵ and Kaifeng was in District Ⅳ.The research showed that a perfect service organization system for new agricultural modernization should be established in Henan Province to guide large-scale circulation of rural land, increase organizational degree of line operation, promote agricultural transformation development and guarantee quantity and quality of agricultural products.It was an inevitable option to accelerate the development of agricultural modernization in the study area.

     

/

返回文章
返回