留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供需特征与情景分析

齐菲 王丰 刘斌 付同刚 高会 刘金铜

齐菲, 王丰, 刘斌, 付同刚, 高会, 刘金铜. 河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供需特征与情景分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(0): 1−12 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220941
引用本文: 齐菲, 王丰, 刘斌, 付同刚, 高会, 刘金铜. 河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供需特征与情景分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(0): 1−12 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220941
QI F, WANG F, LIU B, FU T G, GAO H, LIU J T. Analysis of supply and demand characteristics and scenarios of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Hebei province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(0): 1−12 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220941
Citation: QI F, WANG F, LIU B, FU T G, GAO H, LIU J T. Analysis of supply and demand characteristics and scenarios of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Hebei province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(0): 1−12 doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220941

河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供需特征与情景分析

doi: 10.12357/cjea.20220941
基金项目: 河北省重点研发计划项目(20373304D, 22374202D)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    齐菲, 主要从事生态系统服务研究。E-mail: qifei@sjziam.ac.cn

    通讯作者:

    刘金铜, 主要从事生态系统可持续管理与生态工程研究。E-mail: jtliu@sjziam.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: X24

Analysis of supply and demand characteristics and scenarios of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Hebei province

Funds: The study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Hebei Province (22374202D, 20373304D).
More Information
  • 摘要: 滨海湿地处于海陆生态系统交错地带, 研究湿地面积变化带来的生态系统服务和人类福祉的变化, 可为湿地生态系统服务提升、近海岸生态环境保护与生态安全管理提供参考。本文通过分析河北滨海湿地面积变化, 对2000—2020年河北滨海湿地生态系统服务的供给量和社会对湿地生态系统服务需求量进行评估, 并以供需比定量分析了滨海湿地生态系统服务供需特征, 最后利用情景分析预测了2030年河北滨海湿地供需安全。结果表明: 1)河北滨海湿地生态安全受到威胁, 主要表现为自然湿地面积和湿地生态廊道面积减少。2)除水产品供给服务增加外, 河北滨海湿地的水资源供给、净化环境、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观等生态系统服务供给量均降低, 河北滨海区社会对湿地生态系统服务需求量均呈增加趋势。3)河北滨海湿地面积仅占河北滨海区全域面积的6.3%, 但其提供的调节洪水服务可以满足河北滨海区全域对其需求。4)河北滨海湿地调节洪水服务的生态安全状况较好, 水产品供给服务、水资源供给服务和净化环境服务是目前需要重点关注的生态安全问题, 是未来可能影响河北滨海湿地生态安全的隐患, 固碳、释氧和美学景观服务是未来河北滨海湿地生态安全发展中的短板。5)情景分析下, 湿地严格保护情景下生态系统服务供给量和供需比最高, 是河北滨海湿地生态系统未来发展最好情景模式。
  • 图  1  河北滨海区示意图

    Figure  1.  Schematic diagram of the coastal district in Hebei

    图  2  2000—2020年河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供给量变化率

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.

    Figure  2.  Change rates of ecosystem service supply of Hebei coastal wetland ecosystem from 2000 to 2020

    图  3  河北滨海湿地不同湿地类型的不同生态系统服务的供给量

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。NW为自然湿地, CW为人工湿地, WEC为湿地生态廊道。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape. NW is natural wetland, CW is constructed wetland, and WEC is wetland ecological corridor.

    Figure  3.  Supply of different ecosystem services for different wetland types in Hebei coastal wetlands

    图  4  2000年和2020年河北滨海湿地不同区域的生态系统服务供给量

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。CZ为沧州滨海湿地, TQ为唐秦滨海湿地。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.CZ is Cangzhou Coastal Wetland, and TQ is Tangqin Coastal Wetland.

    Figure  4.  Supply of ecosystem services in different regions of Hebei coastal wetlands in 2000 and 2020

    图  5  2000—2020年河北滨海湿地生态系统服务需求量增加率

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.

    Figure  5.  Increase rate of service demand of Hebei coastal wetland ecosystem from 2000 to 2020

    图  6  河北滨海湿地不同区域的生态系统服务需求量

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。CZ为沧州滨海湿地, TQ为唐秦滨海湿地。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape. CZ is Cangzhou Coastal Wetland, and TQ is Tangqin Coastal Wetland.

    Figure  6.  Demand for ecosystem services in different regions of Hebei coastal wetlands

    图  7  河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供需比

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.

    Figure  7.  Supply demand ratio of Hebei coastal wetland ecosystem services

    图  8  河北滨海湿地不同区域的生态系统服务供需比

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。CZ为沧州滨海湿地, TQ为唐秦滨海湿地。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.CZ is Cangzhou Coastal Wetland, and TQ is Tangqin Coastal Wetland.

    Figure  8.  Supply and demand ratio of ecosystem services in different regions of Hebei coastal wetlands

    图  9  河北滨海湿地不同情景下生态系统服务供给量(a)、需求量(b)及不同情景下供需比(c)预测

    P、R、S、C、AP、WR、PW、RF、FC、RO、AL分别为供给服务、调节服务、支持服务、文化服务、水产品供给、水资源供给、净化水质、调节洪水、固碳、释氧和美学景观。情景①为湿地自然发展情景, 情景②为湿地合理开发情景, 情景③为湿地严格保护情景。P, R, S, C, AP, WR, PW, RF, FC, RO, and AL are provisioning service, regulating service, supporting service, cultural service, aquatic product supply, water resource supply, water purification, flood regulation, carbon fixation, oxygen release, and aesthetic landscape.Scenario ① refers to the natural development of wetlands; Scenario ② refers to the reasonable development of wetlands, and Scenario ③ refers to the strict protection of wetlands.

    Figure  9.  Forecast of ecosystem service supply in different scenarios (a), demand (b) and supply and demand ratio in different scenarios (c) of Hebei coastal wetland

    表  1  河北滨海湿地生态系统服务供给量评估方法

    Table  1.   Evaluation methods of Hebei coastal wetland ecosystem service supply

    生态系统服务
    Ecosystem service
    供给量计算方法
    Supply quantity calculation method
    评估法
    Evaluation method
    供给服务
    provisioning service
    (P)
    水产品供给
    Aquatic products supply
    (AP, ×104 t)
    供给量=单位面积水产品供给量×湿地面积
    Supply = supply of aquatic products per unit area × wetland area
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    水资源供给
    water resource supply
    (WR, ×108 ¥)
    供给量=单位面积水资源供给服务价值×湿地面积×湿地给水深度
    Supply = the value of water resources supply service per unit area × wetland area × wetland water supply depth
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    调节服务
    Regulating service
    (R)
    净化水质
    Water purification
    (PW, ×108 ¥)
    供给量=单位面积净化水质服务价值×湿地面积
    Supply = value of water purification service per unit area × wetland area
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    调节洪水
    Flood regulation
    (RF, ×108 ¥)
    供给量=单位面积调节洪水价值×湿地面积
    Supply = unit area adjusted flood value × wetland area
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    支持服务
    supporting service
    (S)
    固碳
    Carbon fixation
    (FC, ×104 t)
    供给量=1.63×湿地面积×二氧化碳中碳的含量×单位面积的净初级生产量
    Supply =1.63 × wetland area × CO2 content × NPP
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    释氧
    Oxygen release
    (RO, ×104 t)
    供给量=1.19×湿地面积×单位面积的净初级生产量
    Supply =1.19 × wetland area × NPP
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    文化服务
    Cultural service
    (C)
    美学景观
    esthetic landscape
    (AL, ×108 ¥)
    供给量=单位面积文化服务价值×湿地面积
    Supply = the value of cultural services per unit area × wetland area
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  河北滨海湿地生态系统服务需求量估算方法

    Table  2.   Estimation method for service demand of Hebei coastal wetland ecosystem

    生态系统服务
    Ecosystem service
    需求量估算方法
    Demand estimation method
    评估法
    Evaluation method
    供给服务
    Provisioning service
    (P)
    水产品供给
    Aquatic products supply (AP, ×104 t)
    需求量=人均水产品需求量×总人口
    Demand = per capita demand for aquatic products × total population
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    水资源供给
    Water resource supply (WR, ×108 ¥)
    需求量=人均用水量×总人口×水价
    Demand = per capita water consumption × total population × water price
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    调节服务
    Regulating service
    (R)
    净化水质
    Water purification
    (PW, ×108 ¥)
    需求量=人均生活用水量×总人口×净化水体价格
    Demand = per capita domestic water consumption × total population × water purification price
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    调节洪水
    Flood regulation
    (RF, ×108 ¥)
    需求量=水利建设当年新增固定资产
    Demand = new fixed assets in the water conservancy construction year
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    支持服务
    Supporting service
    (S)
    固碳
    Carbon fixation
    (FC, ×104 t)
    需求量=人均碳需求×总人口
    Demand = carbon demand per capita × total population
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    释氧
    Oxygen release
    (RO, ×104 t)
    需求量=人均氧气需求×总人口
    Demand = oxygen demand per capita × total population
    物质量评估
    Quality assessment
    文化服务
    Cultural service
    (C)
    美学景观
    Aesthetic landscape
    (AL, ×108 ¥)
    需求量=人均旅游花费×总人口
    Demand = travel cost per capita × total population
    价值量评估
    Value quantity assessment
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  2000年和2020年河北滨海湿地面积

    Table  3.   Areas of Hebei coastal wetland in 2000 and 2020

    km2 
    滨海地区
    coastal region
    滨海湿地类型
    Coastal wetland type
    20002020
    唐秦滨海湿地
    Tang and Qin coastal wetland
    (TQ)
    自然湿地 Natural wetland105.6028.81
    人工湿地 Constructed wetlands112.24182.41
    湿地生态廊道 Wetland ecological corridor5.277.73
    湿地总面积 Total wetland area217.84211.22
    沧州滨海湿地
    Cangzhou Binhai Wetland
    (CZ)
    自然湿地 Natural wetland144.7199.56
    人工湿地 constructed wetlands127.44170.81
    湿地生态廊道 Wetland ecological corridor6.473.40
    湿地总面积 Total wetland area272.15270.37
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 杨会利. 河北省典型滨海湿地演变与退化状况研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2008

    YANG H L. The study of the evolution and degradation of the typical coastal wetland in Hebei Province[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2008
    [2] 杨永兴. 国际湿地科学研究的主要特点、进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(2): 111−120

    YANG Y X. Main characteristics, progress and prospect of international wetland science research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2002, 21(2): 111−120
    [3] 刘晓辉, 吕宪国, 姜明, 等. 湿地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5625−5631 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.11.047

    LIU X H, LU X G, JIANG M, et al. Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11): 5625−5631 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.11.047
    [4] 傅娇艳, 丁振华. 湿地生态系统服务、功能和价值评价研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(3): 681−686 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2007.03.037

    FU J Y, DING Z H. Research progress on wetland ecosystem service and its valuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(3): 681−686 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2007.03.037
    [5] 杨丽雯, 王大勇, 李双成. 生态系统文化服务供需关系量化方法研究−以平陆大天鹅景区为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 57(4): 691−698

    YANG L W, WANG D Y, LI S C. Quantitative assessment on supply-demand budget of culture ecosystem service: a case study in Pinglu swan scenic spot[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2021, 57(4): 691−698
    [6] 贺芳丁. 山东省湿地演变与生态修复规划研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2006

    HE F D. Research for the evolvement and repair programming of the wetland[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2006
    [7] 姜明, 武海涛, 吕宪国, 等. 湿地生态廊道设计的理论、模式及实践−以三江平原浓江河湿地生态廊道为例[J]. 湿地科学, 2009, 7(2): 99−105

    JIANG M, WU H T, LU X G, et al. Theory, mode and practice for the design of wetland ecological corridor—a case of Nongjiang River wetland ecological corridor, the Sanjiang plain[J]. Wetland Science, 2009, 7(2): 99−105
    [8] 李楠, 李龙伟, 张银龙等. 杭州湾滨海湿地生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(1): 118−129

    LI N, LI L W, ZHANG Y L, et al. Changes of ecosystem services value of Hangzhou Bay Coastal Wetland[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2019, 36(1): 118−129
    [9] 魏强, 席增雷, 苏寒云, 等. 曹妃甸滨海湿地生态系统支持服务价值空间分异研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(5): 890−899

    Wei Q, Xi Z L, Su H Y, et al. Spatial Differentiation of Supporting Service Value of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem in the Caofeidian District of Tangshan in Hebei Province[J]. SCIENTIA GEOGRAPHICA SINICA, 2021, 41(5): 890−899
    [10] 商慧敏, 郗敏, 李悦, 等. 胶州湾滨海湿地生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 421−431

    SHANG H M, GONG M, LI Y, et al. Evaluation of changes in the ecosystem services of Jiaozhou Bay coastal wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 421−431
    [11] 程敏, 张丽云, 崔丽娟, 等. 滨海湿地生态系统服务及其价值评估研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(23): 7509−7518

    CHENG M, LI L Y, CUI L J, et al. Progress in ecosystem services value valuation of coastal wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(23): 7509−7518
    [12] 河北省市场监督管理局. DB13/T2784—2018湿地生态系统服务评估规范[S]. 石家庄: 河北标准出版社, 2018

    Hebei Provincial Market Supervision and Administration Bureau. DB13/T2784—2018 Wetland Ecosystem Service Evaluation Specification[S]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Standards Publishing House, 2018
    [13] WU J. Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1999, 25(4): 367−380 doi: 10.1080/07038992.1999.10874736
    [14] 王文美, 吴璇, 李洪远. 滨海新区生态系统服务功能供需量化研究[J]. 生态科学, 2013, 32(3): 379−385

    WANG W M, WU X, LI H Y. Quantitative research on the supply and demand of ecosystem service function of Tianjin Binhai New Area[J]. Ecological Science, 2013, 32(3): 379−385
    [15] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243−1254

    XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243−1254
    [16] VILLAMAGNA A M, ANGERMEIER P L, BENNETT E M. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2013, 15: 114−121 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
    [17] SCHRÖTER M, BARTON D N, REMME R P, et al. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 539−551 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018
    [18] 郑婵娟, 赵秀阁, 黄楠, 等. 我国成人饮水摄入量研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2014, 31(11): 967−970

    ZHENG C J, ZHAO X G, HUANG N, et al. Investigation of drinking water intake rate of adults in China[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2014, 31(11): 967−970
    [19] 王继燕, 李爱农, 靳华安. 湿地植被净初级生产力估算模型研究综述[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(5): 636−644

    WANG J Y, LI A N, JIN H A. A review on research advances in estimation models for net primary production of vegetation in wetlands[J]. Wetland Science, 2015, 13(5): 636−644
    [20] 朱文泉, 潘耀忠, 张锦水. 中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 413−424 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2007.03.010

    ZHU W Q, PAN Y Z, ZHANG J S. Estimation of net primary productivity of Chinese terrestrial vegetation based on remote sensing[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 413−424 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2007.03.010
    [21] 侯思琰, 徐鹤, 刘德文. 七里海湿地生态服务功能价值评估[J]. 海河水利, 2021(3): 24−27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7328.2021.03.007

    HOU S Y, XU H, LIU D W. Evaluation of the ecological service function of qilihai wetland[J]. Haihe Water Resources, 2021(3): 24−27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7328.2021.03.007
    [22] 年蔚, 陈艳梅, 高吉喜, 等. 京津冀固碳释氧生态服务供-受关系分析[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(9): 783−791

    NIAN W, CHEN Y M, GAO J X, et al. Relationship between provision and reception of ecological service of carbon fixation and oxygen release in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(9): 783−791
    [23] 王婉莹, 刘琳, 李梦娇, 等. 生态-经济发展情景下内蒙古宏观生态系统模拟与分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14): 5888−5898

    WANG W Y, LIU L, LI M J, et al. Scenario-based simulation and analysis of future terrestrial ecosystem changes in Inner Mongolia under different ecological-economic development pathways[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(14): 5888−5898
    [24] CHEN Y D, GUO F, WANG J C, et al. Provincial and gridded population projection for China under shared socioeconomic pathways from 2010 to 2100[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7: 83 doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0421-y
    [25] 姜彤, 赵晶, 曹丽格, 等. 共享社会经济路径下中国及分省经济变化预测[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2018, 14(1): 50−58

    JIANG T, ZHAO J, CAO L G, et al. Projection of national and provincial economy under the shared socioeconomic pathways in China[J]. Climate Change Research, 2018, 14(1): 50−58
    [26] 马旺, 左丽明, 胡琦, 等. 河北省滨海湿地退化及生态修复技术集成与应用研究报告[EB/OL]. 河北省水文工程地质勘查院, 2022

    MA W, ZUO L M, HU Q, et al. Research report on integration and application of coastal wetland degradation and ecological restoration technology in Hebei Province[EB/OL] Hebei Institute of Hydrological Engineering Geology, 2022
    [27] 韩春晓. 河北省海岸带生态系统健康评价研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2012

    HAN C X. The study on coastal ecosystem health assessment in Hebei coastal zone[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Normal University, 2012
    [28] RUSHDI A M A, HASSAN A K. Reliability of migration between habitat patches with heterogeneous ecological corridors[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 304: 1−10 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.02.014
    [29] 李金煜. 济南市小清河河流廊道水生态系统服务供需评估与优化[D]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2022

    LI J Y. Supply and demand assessment and optimization of water ecosystem services in Xiaoqing River corridor of Jinan City[D]. Jinan: Shandong Jianzhu University, 2022
    [30] 孙志高, 刘景双, 秦泗刚, 等. 三江平原湿地农业开发的生态环境问题与区域可持续发展[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2006, 20(4): 55−60

    SUN Z G, LIU J S, QIN S G, et al. Study on the eco-enviromental problems caused by agricultural exploitation of wetland in Sanjiang plain and regional sustainable development[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2006, 20(4): 55−60
    [31] 张春丽, 刘继斌, 佟连军. 湿地生态旅游发展模式研究−以三江平原湿地为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(24): 7579−7581 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2007.24.094

    ZHANG C L, LIU J B, TONG L J. Research on the wetland ecotourism pattern[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 35(24): 7579−7581 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2007.24.094
    [32] 刘晓辉, 吕宪国. 三江平原湿地生态系统固碳功能及其价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2008, 6(2): 212−217

    LIU X H, LU X G. Assessment of service value of wetland ecosystem carbon sequestration in the Sanjiang Plain excluded Muling-xingkai Plain on south of Wanda Mountain[J]. Wetland Science, 2008, 6(2): 212−217
    [33] 冯达, 郑云玉, 温亚利. 我国湿地生态效益补偿制度的需求分析[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2010, 26(9): 831−834 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2010.09.018

    FENG D, ZHENG Y Y, WEN Y L. Analysis of wetland ecological compensation system needs in China[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2010, 26(9): 831−834 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2010.09.018
    [34] JIANG H, PENG J, DONG J Q, et al. Linking ecological background and demand to identify ecological security patterns across the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Maca Greater Bay Area in China[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36(7): 2135−2150 doi: 10.1007/s10980-021-01234-6
    [35] Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Synthesis[R]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005: 7, 40
    [36] TINER R W. Wetlands of the United States: Current Status and Recent Trends[M]. Washington, D. C. : National Wetlands Inventory, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1984
    [37] MALTBY E. Wetland management goals: wise use and conservation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1991, 20(1/2/3): 9−18
    [38] WESTERBERG V H, LIFRAN R, OLSEN S B. To restore or not? A valuation of social and ecological functions of the Marais des Baux wetland in Southern France[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(12): 2383−2393 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.005
    [39] 廖柳文, 秦建新. 环长株潭城市群湿地生态安全研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(9): 1217−1226

    LIAO L W, QIN J X. Ecological security of wetland in Chang-Zhu-Tan urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2016, 18(9): 1217−1226
    [40] 李悦, 袁若愚, 刘洋, 等. 基于综合权重法的青岛市湿地生态安全评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3): 847−855

    LI Y, YUAN R Y, LIU Y, et al. Ecological security evaluation of wetlands in Qingdao based on the comprehensive weighting method[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38(3): 847−855
    [41] 王泉泉, 王行, 张卫国, 等. 滇西北高原湿地景观变化与人为、自然因子的相关性[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 726−738

    WANG Q Q, WANG H, ZHANG W G, et al. The correlations between wetland landscape and social-natural factors on Northwestern Yunnan Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 726−738
    [42] 雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 等. 1990—2018年海南岛湿地景观生态安全格局演变[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(2): 293−302

    LEI J R, CHEN Z Z, CHEN Y Q, et al. Dynamic analysis of wetland landscape ecological security pattern of Hainan Island in 1990-2018[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(2): 293−302
    [43] 周莉. 辽河三角洲芦苇湿地生态系统水碳通量动态及其控制机制[D]. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所, 2005

    ZHOU L. Dynamics and control mechanism of water and carbon flux in reed wetland ecosystem in Liaohe Delta[D]. Beijing: Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  42
  • HTML全文浏览量:  17
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-12-05
  • 录用日期:  2023-03-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回