胡爱双, 郭文静, 邢春强, 马旺, 孙宇, 丁冯洁, 张薇. 曹妃甸湿地自然保护区植物多样性研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(7): 1121−1132. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220940
引用本文: 胡爱双, 郭文静, 邢春强, 马旺, 孙宇, 丁冯洁, 张薇. 曹妃甸湿地自然保护区植物多样性研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2023, 31(7): 1121−1132. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220940
HU A S, GUO W J, XING C Q, MA W, SUN Y, DING F J, ZHANG W. Plant diversity in Caofeidian wetland nature reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(7): 1121−1132. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220940
Citation: HU A S, GUO W J, XING C Q, MA W, SUN Y, DING F J, ZHANG W. Plant diversity in Caofeidian wetland nature reserve[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(7): 1121−1132. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220940

曹妃甸湿地自然保护区植物多样性研究

Plant diversity in Caofeidian wetland nature reserve

  • 摘要: 为了探究曹妃甸湿地和鸟类省级自然保护区植物多样性以及土壤理化性质空间分布规律, 采用生态学样地调查方法对研究区内植被群落结构及其相应土壤理化性质进行调查与测定, 通过相关性分析探讨植物多样性与土壤盐分和养分指标的关系。研究结果表明: 1)研究区种子植物共有23科47属54种, 被子植物占绝对优势, 植物种绝大部分是中生草本植物。2)研究区植物区系数量结构分析显示研究区内优势科有4科, 分别是菊科、禾本科、藜科和豆科; 优势属有5属, 分别是藜属、莴苣属、碱蓬属、蒿属和补血草属; 数量结构特征表现出科级和属级水平上的多样性, 区系地理成分特征相对复杂, 以温带分布为主, 但也出现了热带分布。3)研究区植物群落主要以草本植物为主, 可分为9种类型, 其中茵陈蒿、葎草群落更为稳定, 芦苇群落的多样性最差。4)土壤盐分和速效钾高值区主要分布在研究区西南部地区, 土壤速效磷高值区主要分布在西北部地区, 速效氮和有机质含量高值区空间分布较为分散。5)湿地植物多样性指数整体上与土壤盐分呈负相关关系, 与土壤养分尤其速效氮呈现正相关关系。该研究结果明确了该区植物的分布及多样性情况, 并对其影响因素进行了初步分析, 可为曹妃甸湿地植物多样性保护和管理提供一定科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Coastal wetlands are one of the most biodiverse ecosystems. Studying wetland plant diversity is important for maintaining the integrity and stability of wetland ecosystems. To provide a basis for the scientific management of the coastal wetland ecosystem, this study used the Caofeidian Wetland and Bird Provincial Nature Reserve as the research area, adopted the ecological sampling survey method, and selected sample plots with typical plant communities along the river bank, coast, and the direction perpendicular to the river bank and the coast, to investigate the spatial distribution of plant diversity, soil physical and chemical properties, and calculated the correlation between the two. The results showed that: 1) there were 23 families, 47 genera, and 54 species of seed plants in the study area. Angiosperms were dominant, and most of the plant species were mesophytic herbs. 2) The results of the quantitative structural analysis of the flora showed that there were four dominant families in the study area, namely Asteraceae, Poaceae, Chenopodiaceae and Fabaceae, and three representative families, namely, Chenopodiaceae, Plumbaginaceae, and Salicaceae. There were five dominant genera: Chenopodium, Lactuca, Suaeda, Artemisia, and Limonium, and the characteristic genera were Lactuca and Suaeda. The quantitative structure featured diversity at the family and genus levels. The geographical components of the flora were relatively complex, mainly in temperate and tropical zones. 3) The plant communities in the study area were mainly herbaceous, including nine vegetation communities: Suaeda salsa, Bassia scoparia, Artemisia annua, Suaeda glauca, Phragmites australis, Humulus scandens, Carex phacota, Bidens pilosa, and Artemisia capillaris, among which the communities of A. capillaris and H. scandens were most stable, and the diversity of P. australis community was the lowest. 4) The high-value areas of soil salt and available potassium were mainly distributed in the southwest of the study area, those of soil available phosphorus were mainly distributed in the northwest, and those of available nitrogen and organic matter content were relatively scattered. 5) The wetland plant diversity indexes were negatively correlated with soil salinity and positively correlated with soil nutrients, especially available nitrogen. The results of this study clarified the distribution and diversity of plants in the area and preliminarily analyzed soil impact factors. These results provide a scientific basis for the protection and management of plant diversity in the Caofeidian wetlands.

     

/

返回文章
返回