施氮对玉米||大豆间作产量稳定性的影响

The effect of nitrogen application on yield stability of maize||soybean intercropping systems

  • 摘要: 间作可提升作物产量及产量稳定性, 但对于玉米||大豆间作产量稳定性及施氮对产量稳定性的影响研究甚少。于2018—2021年在甘肃张掖开展田间试验, 设置2个施氮量(N0和300 kg·hm−2)和3种种植方式玉米||大豆间作(M||S)、单作大豆(MS)和单作玉米(MM)。通过测定单间作条件下作物产量, 核算两个施氮量下单间作体系生产力(productivity)、土地当量比(land equivalent ratio, LER)、偏土地当量比(partial land equivalent ratio, pLER)、间作作物超产率(overyielding, OY)、单间作体系及作物产量稳定性(yield stability, YS)、单间作体系氮肥农学利用效率(nitrogen agronomy efficiency, NAE), 并对比分析单间作条件下这些指标的差异, 以明确施氮对玉米||大豆间作体系产量及产量稳定性的影响。主要研究结果如下: M||S体系具有间作产量优势, 相比单作, N0和N300处理下LER的4年平均值分别为1.26和1.17; 施氮可以降低体系的LER值, N300处理LER显著低于N0处理(P<0.05); N0和 N300处理下, 玉米偏土地当量比(pLERm)均大于0.5, N0处理大豆偏土地当量比(pLERs)>0.5, N300处理<0.5; N0和N300处理下, 间作玉米超产率分别为36.88%和64.82%, 间作大豆超产率分别为14.77%和−30.46%; 施氮可以提高产量稳定性, N300处理产量稳定性较N0显著提高112.7% (P<0.05), 单作体系产量稳定性较间作体系显著提高40.1% (P<0.05), 无论单作还是间作, 同一体系内, 施氮对体系的产量稳定性无显著影响; 间作种植中, N300处理间作玉米产量稳定性较N0处理显著提高178.6% (P<0.05), 施氮对大豆产量稳定性无显著影响; 单作种植中, N300处理下单作大豆产量稳定性较N0处理显著提高139.3% (P<0.05), 施氮对单作玉米产量稳定性无显著影响; 间作体系氮肥农学利用效率较单作体系显著提高76.7% (P<0.05)。综上, 在甘肃张掖地区玉米||大豆间作体系中, 产量优势的主要贡献者是玉米, 施氮提升间作玉米产量及产量稳定性, 降低间作大豆产量, 不影响间作大豆产量稳定性。

     

    Abstract: Intercropping can improve yield and yield stability of crop, however, there are few studies on the yield stability of maize||soybean intercropping and the effect of nitrogen application on yield stability. A field experiment was conducted in Zhangye city, Gansu Province, in China, from 2018 to 2021, including two nitrogen rates (N0 and 300 kg·hm−2) and three planting patterns maize||soybean intercropping (M||S), monoculture soybean (MS), and monoculture maize (MM). Crop yields in monoculture and intercropping were determined, the productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), partial land equivalent ratio (pLER), overyielding (OY), yield stability (YS), and nitrogen agronomy efficiency (NAE) were calculated. These indices were analyzed by comparison between monoculture and intercropping in order to clarify the effect of nitrogen on yield and yield stability of the maize||soybean intercropping. The results showed that the M||S intercropping had yield advantage, compared with the monoculture, the LER value under N0 and N300 on average over four years were 1.26 and 1.17, respectively, and the LER value was decreased that the LER value with N300 was lower than that of the N0 (P<0.05); all the partial land equivalent ratios (pLERm) for maize with both N0 and N300 were greater than 0.5, and the partial land equivalent ratios (pLERs) for soybean under N0 were greater than 0.5 and lower than 0.5 under N300; overyielding of intercropped maize under N0 and N300 were 36.88% and 36.88%, respectively, and overyielding of intercropped soybean under N0 and N300 were 14.77% and −30.46%, respectively; Nitrogen application could improve the yield stability, the yield stability of N300 treatment was 112.7 % higher than that of N0 (P<0.05), and the yield stability of monoculture system was 40.1 % higher than that of intercropping system (P<0.05). There was not a significant difference between the yield stability of nitrogen treatments under both intercropping and monoculture systems, In intercropping, the yield stability of intercropping maize in N300 treatment was significantly 178.6 % higher than that in N0 (P<0.05), nitrogen had no significant effect on the yield stability of soybean, in monoculture, the yield stability of monoculture soybean in N300 was significantly 139.3 % higher than that in N0 (P<0.05), and nitrogen application had no significant effect on the yield stability of monoculture maize; The NAE of intercropping was 76.7 % higher than that of monoculture (P<0.05). In summary, the main contributor to the yield advantage is maize in the maize||soybean intercropping system in Zhangye area of Gansu Province. Nitrogen improve the yield and yield stability of intercropping maize, reduces intercropping soybean yield, and does not affect intercropping soybean yield stability.

     

/

返回文章
返回