农业社会化服务绿色发展效应的理论框架与研究展望
Theoretical framework and research prospects on the green development effect of agricultural socialization services
-
摘要: 在经验事实和政策设计层面, 农业社会化服务都被赋予了绿色发展效应的功能, 但农业社会化服务的绿色发展效应问题, 尚未得到系统研究。本研究从农业农村现代化的宏阔背景出发, 通过建构一个整合性的理论框架, 尝试将农业社会化服务与绿色发展的表征变量−农业绿色全要素生产率, 纳入统一分析框架, 并以其分解项−农业绿色技术效率与农业绿色技术进步作为中介变量, 解释农业社会化服务绿色发展效应的作用机理, 将异质性的农户要素禀赋作为调节变量, 解释其在何种情形下对农业社会化服务产生绿色提升效应。未来的研究可以据此蓝本, 进一步细化研究视角, 丰富拓展作用效应路径; 利用农业大数据, 在大样本持续追踪的基础上, 深入考察政策冲击效应等若干议题。这一理论框架可为重新探求小规模农业的现代化之路提供理论依据, 有助于优化面向农户的社会化服务供给, 实现农业功能的拓展性转化, 为政府重新设定现代农业政策发力点提供了现实可能。Abstract: At both the empirical facts and policy design levels, agricultural socialization services have been assigned the function of the green effect; however, the issue of the green development effect of agricultural socialization services has not been systematically studied. Starting from the macro background of agricultural and rural modernization, by constructing an integrative theoretical framework, we try to incorporate the green total factor productivity, the characterizing variables of agricultural socialization services and agricultural green development into a unified analytical framework. With the decomposition terms of agricultural green technical efficiency and agricultural green technical progress as the mediator variables, the functioning mechanism of the green effect of agricultural socialization services was explained. And with the heterogeneous farm household factor endowment as a moderating variable, the circumstances under which it has enhancement impact on agricultural socialization services’ green development effects was explored. The study showed that the direction of the impact of agricultural socialization services on green total factor productivity depended on the elements with the strongest force, and the level of comprehensive factor endowment at the vertical level and the type of factor endowment at the horizontal level of the farmers. There was a certain threshold range of the impact, and the threshold effect of the moderating effect of different types of factor endowment was different. Based on the results, the future research can refine the research perspectives, enrich and expand the path of the effect of agricultural socialization services, and use agricultural big data and continuous survey of large samples to examine the policy effect in depth. This theoretical framework provides a new theoretical reference for re-exploring the modernization path of small-scale agriculture, optimizing the supply of socialized services for farmers, realizing the expansion of agricultural functions, and providing realistic possibilities for the government to reset the starting point of modern agricultural policies.