不同类型村庄对耕地近地表节肢动物分布的影响

Effects of different types of villages on the distribution of arable land near-surface arthropods

  • 摘要: 农业景观中村庄多分布在耕地内部或周边, 是一种特殊的非耕作生境, 但其对耕地生物多样性如何作用尚不明确。本研究选择了辽宁省昌图县南部的3类村庄(内含高、中、低比例半自然生境), 使用陷阱法调查了村庄相邻耕地不同距离梯度处近地表节肢动物分布情况, 采用方差分析和稀疏外推曲线探究了村庄类型、距离梯度对耕地近地表节肢动物群落整体与不同功能团的影响。结果表明: 1)村庄相邻耕地中植食性物种数量最多, 占总数量75.34%, 为研究样地近地表节肢动物主要营养级; 其次为捕食性物种, 占总数量17.94%。2)村庄相邻耕地近地表节肢动物多样性和优势度均呈从农田边缘向耕地内部递减趋势; 较高比例的半自然生境可使得村庄成为近地表节肢动物迁移源地。3)村庄可增加耕地中捕食性天敌的丰富程度, 但也会扩大植食性物种的活动密度, 而内部含有较高比例半自然生境的村庄能够促进更多捕食性天敌扩散至耕地, 进一步遏制害虫爆发。综上, 村庄作为一种特殊的非耕作生境类型, 其内部半自然生境的残存及比例大小是对相邻耕地生物多样性产生影响的关键。增加村庄内部半自然生境面积, 使其成为捕食性天敌的栖身地与避难所, 在害虫爆发时能增益农田生物防控效应。

     

    Abstract: In agricultural landscapes, villages are mostly distributed in or around cultivated land, which is a special non-arable habitat; however, its role in arable land biodiversity is unclear. In this study, three villages (containing high, medium, and low proportions of semi-natural habitats) in the south of Changtu County, Liaoning Province were selected, and the distribution of near-surface arthropods in adjacent farmlands at different distances from the villages was investigated by using the trap method. The effects of village type and distance gradient on the whole and different functional groups of arable land near-surface arthropod communities were investigated by analysis of variance and sparse extrapolation curves. The results showed that 1) the number of plant-eating species in the adjacent cultivated land of the village was the largest, accounting for 75.34% of the total number, which was the main trophic group of the near-surface arthropods in the study field, followed by predatory species, accounting for 17.94% of the total population. 2) The diversity and dominance of near-surface arthropods in the farmland adjacent to the village showed a decreasing trend from the edge to the inside of the cultivated land. The higher proportion of semi-natural habitats made village a source of near-surface arthropod migration. 3) Villages increased the abundance of predators in arable land as well as the activity density of plant-eating species, while villages with a higher proportion of semi-natural habitats promoted the spread of more predators to farmland and further curb pest outbreaks. In summary, whether semi-natural habitats remain or are re-established within a village as a special type of non-arable habitat and their proportion have key impact on the biodiversity of adjacent arable land. Increasing the area of semi-natural habitats within the village by planting flowers or hedges on idle homesteads can provide habitat and refuge for predators, and increase the biological control effect of farmland in the event of pest outbreaks.

     

/

返回文章
返回