县级尺度下河南省农业投入产出效率与减排潜力分析

Agricultural input-output efficiency and the potential reduction of emissions in Henan Province at the county scale

  • 摘要: 农业机械化与化学化进程的推进, 给农业生产带来一系列环境污染和碳排放问题, 因此农业减量投入成为降低农业排放的重要手段。已有研究将碳排放作为非期望产出进而测度农业绿色全要素生产率, 但未深入分析碳减排潜力及其来源贡献。本文基于VRS-DEA两阶段模型和DEA-Malmquist方法, 对河南省105个县级行政单元2000—2020年的农业投入产出效率进行测算, 识别并核算农业生产要素的冗余投入及由此带来的碳减排潜力。研究发现: 1)河南省农业投入带来的碳排放已于2016年达峰后开始下降, 排放量较高县市主要分布在豫东、豫南等平原地区, 单位播种面积排放强度较高县市主要集中于豫北平原。2) 2000—2020年60%的县市农业生产效率提升, 少数县市农业生产效率下降; 22个县市始终处于效率前沿, 高效率地区主要集中在豫南和豫北地区, 低效率地区主要聚集在城市化延伸辐射地区。3)河南省农业平均减排潜力为农业碳排放的11%左右, 城市群周边地区潜在减排率最高, 汝州市、新野县、辉县市、淮滨县等地潜在减排量较高, 是河南省农业重点减排区域。4)河南省农业投入冗余比例由高到低依次为农膜、农药、化肥、农机和农业劳动力, 但由于化肥投入基数大, 其带来的潜在减排量占比高达83.5%, 因此减少化肥过量投入应是农业减排的重中之重。提高农业投入产出效率并有针对性地减少农业冗余投入, 是降低农业碳排放的根本途径。

     

    Abstract: Agricultural modernization and technological progress have substantially improved the efficiency of production. However, the growing dependence on the inputs of agricultural materials has resulted in a series of deleterious issues, such as soil and water pollution, carbon emissions. Previous studies have always considered carbon emissions as an unexpected output when evaluating agricultural green total factor productivity. These studies failed to estimate the potential reduction in carbon emission, as well as the contribution of all sources. This study sought to improve commonly used approaches and enable them to calculate the potential reduction of carbon emissions. To do so, it utilized the variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis (VRS-DEA) two-stage model and the DEA-Malmquist method to evaluate the agricultural input-output efficiency and obtain the abundant input of each material. In this study, six agricultural materials were selected as inputs and five major crop products as outputs with 105 counties/cities in Henan Province, China, as decision-making units from 2000–2020. The results showed the following: 1) carbon emissions induced by agricultural inputs began to decline after reaching their peak in 2016. The counties/cities with higher emissions were primarily distributed in the eastern and southern plains. Those with higher intensities of emissions per unit of sown area were primarily concentrated in the northern plains, where have better terrain conditions. 2) High-agricultural-efficiency areas were primarily concentrated in southern and northern Henan. In contrast, low-agricultural-efficiency counties/cities were primarily concentrated near urbanized areas, indicating that urbanization has a negative effect on agricultural efficiency. Approximately 60% of the counties/cities improved their agricultural efficiency between 2000 and 2020. Those with decreased agricultural efficiency were primarily located in the central and western regions. They were adjacent to areas with a high urbanization rate and primarily included mountainous and hilly areas. 3) The comprehensive potential reduction of carbon emission was approximately 11% of gross agricultural emissions. Counties/cities with the highest potential rate of reduction were primarily distributed in the areas surrounding the developed urban agglomerations. The key areas of agricultural reduction were the three counties/cities of Ruzhou, Xinye, and Huixian, with an accumulated potential reduction of more than one million tons. Ten counties/cities, such as Huaibin and Weihui, had more than half a million tons of accumulated potential reductions. 4) Agricultural inputs with a high redundancy ratio were agriculture plastic films, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, agricultural machinery, and agricultural labor. Chemical fertilizers with immense usage was a major concern; its input had the potential reduction of carbon emission as much as 83.5%. In summary, it is the basic solution for reduction of agricultural carbon emission to increase agricultural input-output efficiency and reduce redundant agricultural inputs. uts.

     

/

返回文章
返回