施氮对玉米||大豆间作产量稳定性的影响

Effect of nitrogen application on yield stability of maize||soybean intercropping system

  • 摘要: 间作可提升作物产量及产量稳定性, 但对于施氮影响玉米||大豆间作产量稳定性的研究甚少。本研究于2018—2021年在甘肃张掖开展田间试验, 设置2个施氮量(0和300 kg·hm−2, 分别记作N0和N300)和3种种植方式玉米||大豆间作(M||S)、单作大豆(MS)和单作玉米(MM)。通过测定单间作条件下作物产量, 核算两个施氮量下单间作体系生产力、土地当量比(LER)、偏土地当量比(pLER)、间作作物超产率(OY)、单间作体系及作物产量稳定性(YS)和单间作体系氮肥农学利用效率(NAE), 并对比分析单间作条件下这些指标的差异, 以明确施氮对玉米||大豆间作体系产量及产量稳定性的影响。主要研究结果如下: 就4年平均水平来看, 相比单作, N0和N300处理下LER值分别为1.26和1.17, 均大于1, 表明M||S体系具有间作产量优势, 且施氮降低了间作产量优势; N0和 N300处理下, 玉米偏土地当量比(pLERm)值分别为0.68和0.82, N0处理大豆偏土地当量比(pLERs)为0.57, N300处理为0.35; N0和N300处理下, 间作玉米超产率分别为36.88%和64.82%, 间作大豆超产率分别为14.77%和−30.46%; 施氮可以提高体系产量稳定性, N300处理产量稳定性较N0显著提高112.7% (P<0.05), 单作体系产量稳定性较间作体系显著提高40.1% (P<0.05), 无论单作还是间作, 同一体系内, 施氮对体系产量稳定性无显著影响; 间作种植中, N300处理间作玉米产量稳定性较N0处理显著提高178.6% (P<0.05), 施氮对大豆产量稳定性无显著影响; 单作种植中, N300处理下单作大豆产量稳定性较N0处理显著提高139.3% (P<0.05), 施氮对单作玉米产量稳定性无显著影响; 间作体系氮肥农学利用效率较单作体系显著提高76.7% (P<0.05)。综上, 在甘肃张掖地区玉米||大豆间作体系中, 产量优势的主要贡献者是玉米, 施氮提升了间作玉米产量及产量稳定性, 降低了间作大豆产量, 不影响间作大豆产量稳定性。

     

    Abstract: Intercropping can improve the yield and stability of crops; however, studies on the effects of nitrogen application rate on yield stability are limited. A field experiment was conducted in Zhangye City, Gansu Province, in China, from 2018 to 2021, including two nitrogen application rates (N0: 0 kg·hm−2; N300: 300 kg·hm−2) and three planting patterns maize||soybean intercropping (M||S), monoculture soybean (MS), and monoculture maize (MM). Crop yields in monoculture and intercropping system were determined. The productivity, land equivalent ratio (LER), partial land equivalent ratio (pLER), overyielding (OY), yield stability (YS), and nitrogen agronomy efficiency (NAE) were calculated. These indices were analyzed by comparing the monoculture and intercropping systems to clarify the effect of nitrogen on the yield and yield stability of M||S intercropping. The results showed that average over year, compared to monoculture, average LER value of the M||S intercropping under N0 and N300 was 1.26 and 1.17, respectively, both were above 1, indicating that there was a intercropping advantage for the M||S intercropping, and nitrogen decreased the advantage. Partial land equivalent ratios for maize (pLERm) under N0 and N300 treatments were 0.68 and 0.82, respectively; pLERs under N0 treatment was 0.57, while it was only 0.35 under N300 treatment. Overyielding of intercropped maize under N0 and N300 treatments were 36.88% and 64.82%, respectively, whereas soybean overyielding were 14.77% and −30.46%, respectively. Nitrogen application improved yield stability, and yield stability under N300 treatment increasd by 112.7% compared to that under N0 treatment (P<0.05). However, monoculture system exhibited 40.1% greater yield stability than that of intercropping system (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the yield stabilities under different nitrogen treatments in both intercropping and monoculture systems. In intercropping system, the yield stability of maize under N300 treatment was significantly higher (178.6%) than that under N0 treatmetn (P<0.05). Nitrogen had no significant effect on the yield stability of soybean. In monoculture system, the yield stability of soybean under N300 treatment was significantly higher (139.3%) than that under N0 treatment (P<0.05); nitrogen application had no significant effect on the yield stability of maize. The NAE in intercropping system was 76.7% higher than that in monoculture system (P<0.05). In summary, the main contributor to yield advantage was maize in the M||S intercropping system in the Zhangye City of Gansu Province. Nitrogen improved the yield and yield stability of maize in intercropping system, reduced soybean yield in intercropping system, and did not affect soybean yield stability in intercropping system.

     

/

返回文章
返回