数字乡村建设能促进乡村绿色发展吗?基于浙江省县域案例的组态分析

Can digital rural construction promote rural green development: A configuration analysis based on county cases in Zhejiang Province

  • 摘要: 数字乡村建设为实现农业农村现代化与乡村发展转型提供了新的可能。乡村绿色发展是乡村生态文明建设的未来方向, 数字乡村建设能否促进乡村绿色发展是亟待回答的现实问题。本研究基于2020年浙江省县域数据, 结合模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)、必要条件分析(NCA)和熵权-CRITIC-TOPSIS方法, 从组态视角分析了数字乡村建设与乡村绿色发展的复杂关系。结果表明: 1)所有前因条件均不单独作为产生乡村高绿色发展水平的必要条件。2)存在4类表现乡村高绿色发展水平的组态, 分别为基建拉动型价值转化驱动、技术效率型生产转型驱动、数据赋能型生态治理驱动和资金拉动型价值转换驱动。3)数字乡村建设主要以数字基建为基础, 以生产数字化带来的绿色技术创新与普及为现实支撑, 以多主体协同参与实现生态共治为组织基础, 以生态转化重塑市场价值为转型动力, 实现乡村绿色发展水平提升。通过数字基建、数字生产、数字治理等方面的数字乡村建设, 能够促进乡村的生产转型、生态治理和价值转化, 实现乡村绿色发展水平的提升。

     

    Abstract: The construction of digital villages plays a vital role in modernizing agriculture and rural areas and facilitating the transformation of rural development. Green development in rural areas is the future direction for the construction of a rural ecological civilization. To achieve sustainable green ecological development in rural areas, determining whether digital village construction promotes rural green development is crucial. Based on the county-level data from Zhejiang Province in 2020, this study used fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, necessary condition analysis, and entropy weight-CRITIC-TOPSIS methods. It first established an evaluation index system to measure the level of rural green development across counties, thereby quantifying their respective levels of rural green development. Building upon this foundation, this study analyzed the complex relationship between digital village construction and rural green development from a configurational perspective. First, none of the antecedent conditions alone were sufficient to guarantee high levels of rural green development. Second, four pathways leading to high levels of rural green development were identified: infrastructure-driven ecological value transformation, efficiency improvement through green technology for green production transition, data empowerment for ecological governance, and capital investment-driven ecological value conversion. According to these results, the construction of digital villages primarily requires the enhancement of the digital infrastructure. Based on this, digital villages support green production through innovations and the popularization of green technologies brought about by the digitalization of production processes, thereby transforming traditional production models, and achieve co-governance of the ecological environment through collaboration among multiple stakeholders on an organizational basis. Promoting the realization of value from ecological environments and products reshapes market value orientations as a driving force for green development transitions, ultimately enhancing rural green development. Through advancements in digital infrastructure, production, and governance, the construction of digital villages can facilitate the green transition of production models, enhance ecological management, and transform ecological value creation, thereby improving rural green development. This comprehensive approach ensures that digital village construction not only drives technological progress but also integrates sustainable practices into rural development, fostering balanced and environmentally friendly growth. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of integrating digital technology with green development strategies in rural areas, emphasizing the potential of digital village construction as a catalyst for sustainable rural transformation. This study provides valuable insights into how digital initiatives can be leveraged to promote green development in rural settings, offering practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners.

     

/

返回文章
返回