添加脲酶抑制剂NBPT对麦秆还田稻田氨挥发的影响

彭玉净; 田玉华; 尹斌

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.00019

添加脲酶抑制剂NBPT对麦秆还田稻田氨挥发的影响

1.
土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室中国科学院南京土壤研究所南京 210008;中国科学院研究生院北京 100049
2.
土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室中国科学院南京土壤研究所南京 210008

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目(31000940, 41071197)资助

计量
- 文章访问数: 2409
- HTML全文浏览量: 87
- PDF下载量: 2632
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-04-10
- 修回日期: 2011-07-28
- 刊出日期: 2011-12-31

Effects of NBPT urease inhibitor on ammonia volatilization in paddy fields with wheat straw application

1.
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture;Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture;Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China

摘要

摘要: 氨挥发是稻田氮素损失的重要途径, 为探明脲酶抑制剂NBPT对小麦秸秆还田稻田中氨挥发的影响, 采用密闭室通气法, 在太湖地区乌珊土上, 研究了脲酶抑制剂n-丁基硫代磷酰三胺(NBPT)对小麦秸秆还田稻田中施肥后尿素水解和氨挥发动态变化的影响。结果表明: 稻田氨挥发损失主要集中在基肥和分蘖肥时期。添加NBPT可明显延缓尿素水解, 推迟田面水NH₄⁺-N峰值出现的时间, 并降低NH₄⁺-N峰值, 降低了田面水氨挥发速率和挥发量。NBPT的效果在基肥和分蘖肥施用后尤为明显, 不加NBPT时施入的尿素在2~3 d内基本水解彻底, NH₄⁺-N和氨挥发速率在第2 d即达到峰值, 两次施肥后NH₄⁺-N峰值分别为132.3 mg·L^-1和66.3 mg·L^-1, 氨挥发峰值为15.6 kg·hm^-2·d^-1和10.4 kg·hm^-2·d^-1; 而添加NBPT后, NH₄⁺-N峰值推迟至施肥后第4 d出现, NH₄⁺-N峰值降至70.7 mg·L^-1和51.6 mg·L^-1, 氨挥发峰值降至4.7 kg·hm^-2·d^-1和2.6 kg·hm^-2·d^-1。添加NBPT使稻田氨挥发损失总量从73.3 kg(N)·hm^-2(占施氮量的24.4%)降低至34.5 kg(N)·hm^-2(占施氮量的11.5%), 降低53%。在添加小麦秸秆稻田中添加NBPT通过延缓尿素水解而显著降低了氨挥发损失。
- 稻田 /
- 小麦秸秆 /
- 尿素 /
- 脲酶抑制剂(NBPT) /
- 氨挥发田面水
Abstract: While ammonia volatilization is the main mode of nitrogen loss in paddy fields, urease inhibitors are known to effectively inhibit urease activity, delay urea hydrolysis and reduce ammonia emission. Urease inhibitors have, however, not been widely applied in paddy fields. In this study, the effects of NBPT urease inhibitor on the dynamic changes in urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization in wheat-straw incorporated gley paddy soils in Taihu Lake region were investigated via the dynamic chamber method. Results showed that ammonia volatilization mainly occurred during basal and tillering fertilization periods. While the highest ammonia volatilization was at basal fertilization stage, the lowest was at booting fertilization stage. Ammonia volatilization mainly occurred within three days after fertilization. Applying NBPT one day before fertilization significantly retarded urea hydrolysis, delayed occurring time and decreased value of NH₄⁺-N peak and reduced rate and amount of ammonia volatilization of surface water. After basal and tillering fertilization, urea hydrolysis ended within 2~3 days after fertilization, NH₄⁺-N and ammonia volatilization peaks occurred on the second day under non-NBPT treatment. Peak values of NH₄⁺-N of basal and tillering fertilization were 132.3 mg·L^-1and 66.3 mg·L^-1, respectively. Also ammonia volatilization peak values were 15.6 kg·hm^-2·d^-1 and 10.4 kg·hm^-2·d^-1, respectively. Under NBPT treatment, however, the peak of NH₄⁺-N occurred 4 days after fertilization after which it dropped to 70.7 mg·L^-1 and then to 51.6 mg·L^-1. After 4 days of fertilization, ammonia volatilization peak dropped to 4.7 kg·hm^-2·d^-1 and then to 2.6 kg·hm^-2·d^-1. Total ammonia volatilization dropped from 73.3 kg(N)·hm^-2 (24.4% of applied N) to 34.5 kg(N)·hm^-2 (11.5% of applied N) after NBPT application, a drop of 53%. NBPT application in wheat-straw incorporated paddy fields significantly reduced ammonia volatilization by delaying urea hydrolysis. It was recommended that NBPT urease inhibitor could be used as nitrogen fertilizer additive to inhibit ammonia loss in paddy fields.
- Gley paddy field /
- Wheat straw /
- Urea /
- NBPT urease inhibitor /
- Ammonia volatilization

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 等. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103
[2]	朱兆良, 张绍林, 尹斌, 等. 太湖地区单季晚稻产量?氮肥施用量反应曲线的历史比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1): 1-5
[3]	Liu X J, Ai Y W, Zhang F S, et al. Crop production, nitrogen recovery and water use efficiency in rice-wheat rotation as affected by non-flooded mulching cultivation (NFMC)[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2005, 71(3): 289-299
[4]	Fillery R P, De Datta S K. Ammonia volatilization from ni-trogen fertilizer as a N loss mechanism in flooded rice fields[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1986, 9: 78-98
[5]	Erisman J W, Bleeker A, Galloway J, et al. Reduced nitrogen in ecology and the environment[J]. Environ Pollut, 2007, 150(1): 140-149
[6]	Freney J R. Strategies to reduce gaseous emissions of nitrogen from irrigated agriculture[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroeco-systems, 1997, 48(1/2): 155-160
[7]	佘冬立, 王凯荣, 谢小立, 等. 稻草还田的土壤肥力与产量效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(1): 100?104
[8]	刘世平, 陈后庆, 聂新涛, 等. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(5): 51-56
[9]	Lal R B, Kissel D E, Cabrera M L, et al. Kinetics of urea hy-drolysis in wheat residue[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1993, 25(8): 1033-1036
[10]	Wang Z P, Van Cleemput O, Demeyer P, et al. Effect of urease inhibitors on urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 1991, 11(1): 43-47
[11]	Antisari L V, Marzadori C, Gioacchini P, et al. Effects of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) phosphorothioic triamide in low concentrations on ammonia volatilization and evolution of mineral nitrogen[J]. Biol Fertil Soils, 1996, 22(3): 196-201
[12]	宁国辉, 刘树庆, 张笑归. 脲酶抑制剂的研究进展[J]. 河北环境科学, 2003(4): 30-33
[13]	丁和平, 王帅, 王楠. 氮肥增效技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 现代农业科学, 2009, 16(2): 24-26
[14]	Sanz-Cobena A, Misselbrook T H, Arce A, et al. An inhibitor of urease activity effectively reduces ammonia emissions from soil treated with urea under Mediterranean conditions[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2008, 126(3/4): 243-249
[15]	Turnera D A, Edisa R B, Chen D, et al. Determination and mitigation of ammonia loss from urea applied to winter wheat with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphorictriamide[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2010, 137(3/4): 261-266
[16]	康莉, 周文生, 侯翠红, 等. 脲酶抑制剂的研究综述[J]. 河南化工, 2009, 26(2): 8-10
[17]	Freney J R. Strategies to reduce gaseous emissions of nitrogen from irrigated agriculture[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroeco-systems, 1997, 48(1/2): 155-160
[18]	田光明, 蔡祖聪, 曹金留, 等. 镇江丘陵区稻田化肥氮的氨挥发及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2001, 38(3): 324-332
[19]	田玉华, 贺发云, 尹斌, 等. 太湖地区氮磷肥施用对稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(5): 893-900
[20]	严小蓉. 游泳池水中尿素检测方法改进[J]. 中国实用医药, 2009, 4(5): 27-29
[21]	蔡贵信. 氨挥发[M]//朱兆良, 文启孝主编. 中国土壤氮素. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1992
[22]	Freney J R, Keerthisinghe D G, Phongpan S, et al. Effect of urease, nitrification and algal inhibitors on ammonia loss and grain yield of flooded rice in Thailand[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1995, 40(3): 225-233
[23]	彭世彰, 杨士红, 徐俊增. 节水灌溉稻田氨挥发损失及影响因素[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(8): 35-39
[24]	黄进宝, 范晓晖, 张绍林. 太湖地区铁渗水耕人为土稻季上氮肥的氨挥发[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(5): 786-792
[25]	朱兆良, 邢光熹. 氮循环[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2002: 63-64
[26]	贺发云, 尹斌, 金雪霞, 等. 南京两种菜地土壤氨挥发的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(2): 253-259
[27]	Rawluk C D L, Grant C A, Racz G J. Ammonia volatilization from soils fertilized with urea and varying rates of urease inhibitor NBPT[J]. Can J Soil Sci, 2001, 81(2): 239-246

施引文献

资源附件(0)

计量

文章访问数: 2409
HTML全文浏览量: 87
PDF下载量: 2632
被引次数: 0

添加脲酶抑制剂NBPT对麦秆还田稻田氨挥发的影响

计量

出版历程

Effects of NBPT urease inhibitor on ammonia volatilization in paddy fields with wheat straw application

计量

出版历程

目录