特色农业对农户生计韧性的影响研究——以广西凤山县为例

  • 摘要: 深入探讨特色农业对农民生计的影响机制对实现共同富裕具有重要意义。本文以广西凤山县为研究区域,基于实地调研数据,构建了特色农业影响农户生计韧性的理论框架与评价指标体系,综合运用综合指数法、Kruskal-Wallis检验与障碍度模型,系统分析了不同农业参与程度下农户生计韧性的水平差异及其影响因素。结果表明:(1)特色农业通过要素配置、风险应对与知识溢出等路径影响农户生计韧性,农户参与程度在其中发挥关键调节作用,引致生计韧性形成路径呈现异质性;(2)样本农户生计韧性整体处于较低水平,能力结构呈现“缓冲能力>自组织能力>学习能力”的特征,且参与程度与生计韧性呈显著正相关;(3)社区赋权、家庭存款、合作社参与、生计渠道及村务参与频率是制约农户生计韧性提升的主要障碍因子。建议从优化资源分配、拓宽增收渠道、提升合作社效能等方面系统增强农户生计韧性,推动其生活生产水平全面提高。

     

    Abstract: In-depth exploration of the mechanisms through which characteristic agriculture impacts farmers’ livelihoods holds significant implications for achieving common prosperity. Taking Fengshan County, Guangxi as the study area, this paper constructs a theoretical framework and evaluation index system for assessing how characteristic agriculture influences farm households’ livelihood resilience based on field survey data. By comprehensively employing the composite index method, Kruskal-Wallis test, and obstacle degree model, it systematically analyzes the disparity in livelihood resilience levels among households at different levels of agricultural participation and their influencing factors. The results indicate: (1) Characteristic agriculture influences farm households’ livelihood resilience through pathways such as factor allocation, risk response, and knowledge spillovers, with the degree of household participation playing a key moderating role, leading to heterogeneous pathways in the formation of livelihood resilience; (2) Overall livelihood resilience among sampled farm households remains low, with a capability structure characterized by “buffer capacity > self-organization capacity > learning capacity.” Participation levels show a significant positive correlation with livelihood resilience; (3) Community empowerment, household savings, cooperative participation, livelihood channels, and village affairs participation frequency constitute the primary constraints limiting improvements in household livelihood resilience. It is recommended to systematically enhance the resilience of farm households’ livelihoods by optimizing resource allocation, expanding income-generating channels, and improving the efficiency of cooperatives, thereby promoting a comprehensive improvement in their living and production standards.

     

/

返回文章
返回