间作藜麦对盐碱地花生铁营养及光合特性的影响

Effects of intercropping quinoa on iron nutrition, photosynthetic characteristics of peanuts in saline-alkali soil

  • 摘要: 缺铁黄化导致的光合能力下降是影响盐碱地花生产量和品质提升的重要障碍因子。为了探究藜麦花生间作模式对盐碱地花生铁营养及光合特性的影响及地下部响应机理, 通过大田试验及根系分隔的方法, 设置花生单作(MP)、藜麦花生间作无分隔(IPW)、藜麦花生间作尼龙网分隔(IPN)和藜麦花生间作塑料布分隔(IPP)共4个处理, 分析不同间作处理对花生铁吸收利用、光合性能、土壤理化性质、根系形态及产量的影响。结果表明, 与MP处理相比, IPW处理可显著提高花生苗期和结荚期植株器官铁含量及吸收量, 增加叶绿素及类胡萝卜素含量, 降低叶片黄化比例, 提高净光合速率, 增加生育后期干物质积累, 保证了荚果产量, 而IPN处理结荚期花生铁吸收及光合特性有一定改善, 但效果低于IPW处理, 而IPP处理未改善花生铁吸收及光合特性; IPW处理苗期和结荚期土壤电导率分别降低28.85%和14.27%, 土壤有效铁含量增加7.09%和9.62%, 有机质含量增加17.28%和29.52%, 结荚期花生根系的生长及形态发育优于MP。相关性分析表明, 花生铁吸收量及产量与土壤电导率呈负相关, 与土壤有效铁含量、花生总根长及根表面积等根系形态发育指标显著正相关。综上所述, IPW处理可改善盐碱地花生铁营养, 提高花生光合性能和干物质积累; 土壤电导率降低、有效铁含量增加及根系形态结构的优化是间作藜麦改善盐碱地花生铁营养的地下部响应策略。

     

    Abstract: The decrease in photosynthetic capacity caused by iron deficiency chlorosis is a key limiting factor affecting the improvement of peanut yield and quality in saline-alkali soil. To explore the effects of quinoa-peanut intercropping on iron nutrition, photosynthetic characteristics, and belowground response mechanisms of peanuts in saline-alkali soil, a field experiment combined with root separation methods was conducted. Four treatments were set up in the experiment including: peanut monocropping (MP), quinoa-peanut intercropping without separation (IPW), quinoa-peanut intercropping with nylon net separation (IPN), and quinoa-peanut intercropping with plastic sheet separation (IPP). The effects of different intercropping treatments on iron uptake and utilization, photosynthetic characteristics, soil physical and chemical properties, root morphology, and yield of peanut were analyzed. The results showed that compared with MP treatment, IPW treatment significantly increased the iron content and uptake in peanut plant organs at the seedling and pod-setting stages, enhanced the contents of chlorophyll and carotenoids, reduced the leaf yellowing rate, improved the net photosynthetic rate, and increased dry matter accumulation in the late growth stage, ensuring the pod yield of peanut. In contrast, IPN treatment improved the iron uptake and photosynthetic characteristics of peanuts to a certain extent at the pod-setting stage, but the effect was weaker than that of IPW. However, IPP treatment did not show any improvement in peanut iron uptake or photosynthetic characteristics. Additionally, IPW treatment reduced soil electrical conductivity by 28.85% and 14.27%, increased soil available iron content by 7.09% and 9.62%, and soil organic matter content by 17.28% and 29.52%, respectively. Root growth and morphological development of peanut at the pod-setting stage in IPW were better than those in MP. Correlation analysis showed that peanut iron uptake and peanut yield were negatively correlated with soil electrical conductivity, and significantly positively correlated with soil available iron content and root morphological development indicators such as total root length and root surface area of peanut. To summarize, IPW treatment can improve the iron nutrition of peanuts in saline-alkali soils, enhance peanut photosynthetic performance and dry matter accumulation. The reduction of soil electrical conductivity, increase of available iron content and optimization of root morphological structure are the underground response strategies of intercropping quinoa to improve iron nutrition of peanuts in saline-alkali soils.

     

/

返回文章
返回