秸秆还田与浅埋滴灌对大兴安岭南麓黑土质量及玉米产量的影响*

Effects of Straw Returning and Shallow Buried Drip Irrigation on Black Soil Quality and Maize Yield in the Southern Foot of the Greater Khingan Mountains

  • 摘要: 探讨秸秆还田与浅埋滴灌对大兴安岭南麓黑土区土壤质量及作物产量的影响研究,以期为该区域土壤有机质和土壤质量改善提供理论与技术支撑。研究采用秸秆还田(S)和浅埋滴灌(D)双因素田间试验设计(6个处理:秸秆不还田无滴灌和有滴灌,S0D0和S0D1;秸秆每年还田无滴灌和无滴灌,S1D0和S1D1;秸秆隔年还田无滳灌和有滴灌,S2D0和S2D1),研究秸秆还田和浅埋滴灌对黑土质量及玉米产量的影响。结果表明:秸秆还田对0~20 cm土壤容重、0~40 cm土壤田间持水量和总有机碳含量有显著影响(P < 0.05),秸秆每年还田有滴灌处理(S1D1)土壤容重最小,田间持水量最大;秸秆每年和隔年还田土壤总有机碳含量分别较秸秆不还田显著增幅18.0% ~ 20.7%和17.6% ~ 20.0%;浅埋滴灌对20~40 cm土壤全氮含量有显著影响(P < 0.05),秸秆还田、浅埋滴灌及二者交互作用对0~20 cm土壤全磷含量均有显著影响(P < 0.05),秸秆还田显著增加0~40 cm土壤有效磷含量(P < 0.05),且均以秸秆每年还田有滴灌(S1D1)处理含量最大。秸秆还田和浅埋滴灌显著增加0~20 cm土壤微生物量碳含量和β-木糖苷酶活性(P < 0.05),秸秆还田显著增加20~40 cm土壤微生物量碳和0~20 cm土壤微生物量氮含量(P < 0.05),同时显著提高0~40 cm土壤纤维二糖水解酶、β-1, 4-乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶和亮氨酸氨基肽酶活性(P < 0.05),且均以秸秆每年还田有滴灌处理(S1D1)效果最好。秸秆还田、浅埋滴灌以及二者交互作用均可显著提升0~20 cm土壤质量指数(P < 0.05),且以秸秆每年还田有滴灌(S1D1)处理土壤质量指数最大(1.58);秸秆每年和隔年还田处理较不还田处理玉米产量增幅分别为6.7%(P < 0.05)和2.2%;玉米产量与0~40 cm土壤质量指数均呈显著正相关关系(P < 0.05)。由此可见,秸秆还田与浅埋滴灌可以改善土壤通性和持水性,显著增加土壤有机碳、全磷和有效磷含量,提高微生物量碳氮和胞外酶活性,显著提升土壤质量,进而显著提高玉米产量;秸秆每年还田(秋还田13500 kg·hm-2)与浅埋滴灌(灌水定额450 m3·hm-2,灌水4~5次)措施对该地区土壤质量及玉米产量提升效果最优。

     

    Abstract: Investigating the effects of straw returning and shallow buried drip irrigation on soil quality and crop yield in the black soil region of the southern Greater Khingan Mountains foothills, with implications for enhancing soil organic matter and improving soil quality in the target area. A two-factor field experiment was established at the Agriculture Bureau in Jarud Banner, Xing'an League, located on the southern foothills of the Greater Khingan Mountains. The factors were three straw return strategies (S0: no return; S1: annual return; S2: every other year return) and two irrigation regimes (D0: no drip; D1: shallow buried drip irrigation), resulting in six treatments labeled as S0D0, S0D1, S1D0, S1D1, S2D0, and S2D1. We analyzed soil physicochemical properties, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN), key carbon- and nitrogen-cycling extracellular enzyme activities, and maize yield. The results showed straw returning significantly decreased soil bulk density (0–20 cm) and increased field capacity (0–40 cm), total organic carbon (TOC), and available phosphorus (AP) (P < 0.05). Notably, annual and biennial straw return increased TOC by 18.0%–20.7% and 17.6%–20.0% compared to the no-straw control, respectively. While shallow buried drip irrigation was the main factor influencing total nitrogen (TN), a significant interaction between straw returning and shallow buried drip irrigation was observed for total phosphorus (TP). Soil biological activity was also significantly enhanced. Straw returning increased microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN), as well as the activities of key enzymes related to carbon and nitrogen cycling (including β-xylosidase, cellobiohydrolase, β-1, 4-N-acetylglucosaminidase, and leucine aminopeptidase) (P<0.05). Reflecting these widespread improvements, the integrated Soil Quality Index (SQI) was significantly enhanced by the combined practices, with the annual straw return with shallow buried drip irrigation (S1D1) treatment achieving the highest SQI value (1.58). This enhancement in overall soil quality translated directly to crop productivity. The S1D1 treatment produced the highest maize yield, and a significant positive correlation was found between the SQI and maize yield (P < 0.05). The combination of straw returning and shallow buried drip irrigation effectively improved soil physicochemical properties, enhanced extracellular enzyme activities, and increased maize yield. Among the practices, the straw returning every year (autumn application at 13, 500 kg hm-2) combined with shallow buried drip irrigation (irrigation quota of 450 m³ hm⁻², applied 3–5 times) demonstrated the most optimal effects on improving soil quality and maize yield in the region.

     

/

返回文章
返回