再生稻高产与碳盈余形成的生理生态机制研究
The physioecological mechanisms underpinning high yield and carbon surplus in rice ratooning
-
摘要: 探索再生稻高产与净生态系统碳收支平衡机制对于进一步挖掘再生稻增产潜力, 实现绿色低碳农业目标具有重要意义。本研究以两个不同生育期的再生稻品种为材料, 2023—2024年在福建省莆田市秀屿区乡村振兴研究院试验农场(25°18′N, 119°07′E)研究了不同再生稻模式的头季稻(MC)及其再生季稻(RSR)和单季稻(LR)的产量形成、根际微生物动态和稻田净生态系统碳收支(NECB)状态及其关联性机制。结果表明, RSR一季日均产量比头季稻(MC)和同期抽穗单季稻(LR)分别提高了46.37%~82.66%和42.35%~86.61%, 不同种植制度的穗粒数对产量的直接作用最大, 有效穗数次之, 造成这一差异的原因可能是RSR的干物质转运效率较MC和LR分别提高了41.49%和41.44%, 且有更多的干物质转向穗部。此外, RSR光合产物向地下部(根和土壤)的分配量较MC和LR分别减少56.05%~58.79%和52.14%~53.19%, 分配比例分别减少49.39%~54.11%和49.28~49.40%, 而光合产物向穗(粒)分配量较MC和LR分别提高5.10%~17.67%和19.48%~20.30%, 分配比例分别增加21.04%~31.04%和27.49%~29.14%, 最终导致其收获指数和一季日均产量高于MC和LR。此外, 稻田温室气体排放强度和NECB分析结果发现, 再生稻种植模式(RR)的日均碳排放强度比单季稻种植模式(LR)降低52.12%~60.96%。对比分析表明, 不同种植模式的碳汇能力存在显著差异。RR展现出强大的碳封存能力, 其碳盈余范围17.78~32.85 t(CO2-eq)·hm-2。相比之下, LR模式表现出相对较弱的碳汇功能, 碳盈余范围仅为5.70~11.67 t(CO2-eq)·hm-2。这种差异源于两个关键机制: 首先, 再生稻栽培通过其独特的生长周期(头季和再生季)配置有效地延长了光温资源的利用时间, 从而提高了光合作用中的碳固定量及其效率; 其次, 分析根际微生物营养策略发现, RSR的自养菌(碳固定者)相对丰度比MC和LR分别提高55.54%和32.36%, 异养菌(碳分解者)相对丰度分别减少8.36%和19.19%, 以适应光合13C向地上部器官, 特别是籽粒库, 分配量增多, 而向根和土壤的分配量相应下降, 最终使土壤碳排放降低, 碳储量保持相对稳定的生态策略。这是再生稻, 特别是再生季稻一季日均产量高和碳盈余形成的重要生理生态韧性响应机制。研究结果对于深入探索农业碳中和技术、促进农业低碳绿色可持续发展具有重要理论和实践意义。Abstract: Exploring the mechanisms underlying high-yield formation and its carbon budget balance in rice ratooning is of significant importance for further unlocking the yield potential. This study was conducted in Putian, Fujian province (119°07′E, 25°18′N). Two varieties with varying growth durations were utilized to examine the yield formation of the main crop (MC), ratoon season rice (RSR), and the counterpart single cropping rice (LR). The dynamics of rhizosphere microorganisms, and the net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) in paddy fields, as well as the underlying associated mechanisms influencing these processes were also investigated in 2023 and 2024. The results demonstrate that the average daily yield of RSR was 46.37% to 82.66% and 42.35% to 86.61% higher compared to that of MC and LR synchronously heading with RSR, respectively. This discrepancy was attributed to the higher dry matter transport efficiency of RSR by 41.49% and 41.44%, and the greater amount of dry matter transferred to the panicles compared with MC and LR, respectively. Compared to that of MC and LR, the allocation of photosynthetic products to the below-ground parts (roots and soil) in RSR decreased by 56.05%−58.79% and 52.14%−53.19%, respectively, with the allocation proportion reduced by 49.39%−54.11%, and 49.28−49.40%, respectively. Conversely, compared to MC and LR, the allocation of photosynthetic products to the panicle organs of RSR increased by 5.10%−17.67% and 19.48%−20.30%, respectively, with the allocation proportion reduced by 21.04%−31.04% and 27.49%−29.14%, respectively. This in turn resulted in a higher harvest index and average daily yield of RSR. Moreover, the analyses of greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI) and NECB in paddy fields demonstrated that the daily average carbon emission index of MC+RSR system decreased by 52.12%−60.96% compared with that of LR counterpart. The comparative analysis reveals significant differences in carbon sink capacities between cropping patterns. The MC+RSR system demonstrates robust carbon sequestration performance, achieving a carbon balance ranging from 17.78 to 32.85 t(CO2-eq)·hm-2. In contrast, the counterpart LR exhibits relatively weaker carbon sink functionality with a surplus of only 5.70 to 11.67 t(CO2-eq)·hm-2. This divergence stems from two key mechanisms: effectively extending the utilization period of light and thermal resources through its unique growth cycle configuration (main crop-ratooning rice), and increasing a carbon fixer, but decreasing the carbon decomposers in RSR rhizosphere soil, relative to that in MC and LR, respectively. These findings provide an evidence for advancing agricultural carbon neutrality technologies, and for achieving the goals of agricultural low-carbon, green and sustainable development.
下载: