缓释氮肥减量替代对水稻-小麦/紫云英轮作土壤活性有机碳、碳库管理指数及经济效益的影响

  • 摘要: 明确紫云英翻压还田和缓释氮肥减量替代常规氮肥对稻田土壤有机碳(SOC)组分及其碳库管理指数(CPMI)的影响及其稳产/增产效应, 可为制定利于SOC固存和稻田耕地可持续利用的缓释氮肥施用方案提供理论依据。本文以究以长江中下游平原水稻-小麦和水稻-紫云英两种轮作体系为研究对象, 探讨了紫云英翻压还田和缓释氮肥减量替代常规氮肥对SOC、活性有机碳和CPMI的影响, 并探究其水稻稳产/增产效应。试验采用二因素完全随机区组设计, 其主因子为轮作体系: 水稻-小麦(稻麦, W-R)和水稻-紫云英(稻紫, CMV-R)两种轮作体系; 副因子为氮肥施用方式:常规施氮(CN)、缓释氮肥等氮替代常规氮肥(SRN)以及在SRN基础上水稻生长季减氮20% (T1)、减氮40% (T2)和减氮60% (T3), 且在小麦生长季T1、T2和T3处理减氮水平分别调整为减氮10%、20%和30%。与W-R轮作体系相比, CMV-R轮作体系水稻产量可显著提高2.0%, 而周年周年净收益却降低20.4%。CMV-R轮作体系总活性有机碳(TLOC)、高活性有机碳(HLOC)和中活性有机碳(MLOC)含量以及碳库管理指数较W-R显著增加5.2%、6.0%、5.1% 和6.6%, 而SOC、低活性有机碳(LLOC)和惰性有机碳(NLOC)含量却无显著差异。与CN处理相比, SRN和T1处理水稻产量显著增加12.6%和7.3%, 周年净收益增加38.8%和20.7%, 而T3处理水稻产量却降低9.4%。 SRN处理TLOC、HLOC含量和CPMI较CN处理显著增加7.1%、6.9%和9.4%, 而SOC含量却无显著差异。同时, T1处理SOC、TLOC、HLOC、MLOC、LLOC、NLOC含量和CPMI与CN处理均无显著差异, 而T2和T3处理均有所降低。综合轮作体系和氮肥施用方式, CMV-R轮作体系下的SRN处理水稻产量、SOC、TLOC、HLOC、MLOC含量和CPMI均高于其余各处理, 其次是W-R轮作体系下的SRN处理和CMV-R轮作体系下的T1处理, 且CMV-R轮作体系下的T1处理与W-R轮作体系下的SRN处理无显著差异。因此, 在长江中下游平原稻区, 采用水稻-紫云英轮作体系结合缓释氮肥替代常规氮肥, 甚至是减氮20%替代常规氮肥, 利于土壤有机碳的固存和稻田耕地的可持续利用, 进而对该地区农业的可持续生产具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: Clarifying the effects of Chinese milk vetch (CMV) incorporation and substitution of conventional nitrogen fertilizers with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, carbon pool management index (CPMI) and the maintenance/increase of rice grain yield, can provide a theoretical basis for formulating application schemes of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers that are conducive to SOC sequestration and the sustainable utilization of paddy fields. In this study, the effects of CMV incorporation and substitution of conventional nitrogen fertilizers with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on SOC, labile organic carbon (LOC) and CPMI were studied quantitatively in rotation systems of rice-wheat and rice-CMV in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin, and even investigated their effects on the maintenance/increase of rice grain yield. The experiment adopted a two-factor completely randomized block design, with the main factors being the crop rotation systems: rice-wheat (W-R) and rice-CMV (CMV-R). The secondary factor was the nitrogen fertilizer application methods: conventional nitrogen fertilizer (CN), slow-release nitrogen fertilizer substitution for conventional nitrogen fertilizer based on the same nitrogen input (SRN), 10% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during wheat growth period and 20% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during rice growth period (T1), 20% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during wheat growth period and 40% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during rice growth period (T2), 30% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during wheat growth period and 60% nitrogen reduction based on SRN during rice growth period (T3). Compared with the W-R, the rice yield of the CMV-R significantly increased by 2.0%, while the annual net income decreased by 20.4%. The contents of total labile organic carbon (TLOC), high labile organic carbon (HLOC), and medium labile organic carbon (MLOC) as well as CPMI increased significantly by 5.2%, 6.0%, 5.1%, and 6.6% respectively. However, there was no significant difference in contents of SOC, low labile organic carbon (LLOC), and no labile organic carbon (NLOC) between W-R and CMV-R. Compared with the CN, the rice yields of SRN and T1 increased significantly by 12.6% and 7.3%, and the annual net income increased by 38.8% and 20.7% respectively, while the rice yield of T3 decreased by 9.4%. The contents of TLOC, HLOC and CPMI in SRN increased significantly by 7.1%, 6.9% and 9.4%, respectively, relative ti the CN, while there was no significant difference for SOC content between CN and SRN. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in contents of SOC, TLOC, HLOC, MLOC, LLOC and NLOC as well as CPMI between T1 and CN, while they decreased significantly under T2 and T3 relative to the CN. Based on the crop rotation system and nitrogen fertilizer application methods, the rice yield, SOC, TLOC, HLOC, MLOC contents and CPMI of SRN under CMV-R were all higher than those of the other treatments, followed by the SRN under W-R and the T1 under CMV-R. In addition, no significant difference was found for the rice yield, SOC, TLOC, HLOC, MLOC contents and CPMI between T1 under CMV-R and SRN under W-R. Therefore, in the rice-growing areas in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin, adopting rice-Chinese milk vetch rotation system combined with substitution of conventional nitrogen fertilizers with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers (SRN), and even under 20% nitrogen reduction based on SRN is conducive to soil organic carbon sequestration and the sustainable utilization of paddy fields, which is of great significance for the sustainable production of agriculture in this region

     

/

返回文章
返回