大豆玉米带状复合种植产量、效益及关键因素研究

Yield, economic benefit, and key impact factors in the strip intercropping system of soybean and maize

  • 摘要: 目前我国大豆严重依赖进口, 大豆产能不足限制了我国大豆产业的发展, 同时也对粮食安全造成严重威胁, 因此提高大豆综合产能、增强供需自给力势在必行。大豆玉米带状复合种植作为近年来主推技术模式之一, 为扩大大豆种植面积、提高大豆产量开辟了新的技术途径。本研究基于2024年全国19个省(自治区、直辖市)大豆玉米带状复合种植1012份有效调研问卷, 系统分析了大豆玉米产量、种植成本、经济效益、土地当量比, 以及种植行比、种植密度和品种对产量的影响, 结果表明: 1)该模式下全国大豆平均产量为1642 kg∙hm−2, 玉米平均产量为6916 kg∙hm−2, 黄淮海总产量最高, 为9905 kg∙hm−2, 分别比西北和西南地区高13%和45%。三大主推区的经济效益为9210~12451 ¥∙hm−2, 黄淮海地区较高的土地租金导致其经济效益低于西北和西南地区。2)该模式土地当量比为1.42~1.70, 全国平均值为1.55, 黄淮海地区平均值最高, 为1.63, 西南和西北地区分别为1.56和1.55。3)从大豆玉米行比来看, 黄淮海地区行比采用6∶4的样本占比最高, 约39%; 在6∶4的行比下, 大豆种植密度为12.8万~15万株∙hm−2的样本占比最高(40%), 对应玉米种植密度为4.2万~10.5万株∙hm−2。西北地区行比采用4∶4的样本占比最高, 约35%; 在4∶4的行比下, 大豆种植密度为12.75万~15万株∙hm−2的样本占比最高(48%), 对应玉米种植密度为3.75万~8.25万株∙hm−2。西南地区行比选择3∶2的样本占比最高, 约60%; 在3∶2的行比下, 大豆种植密度为10.5万~12.45万株∙hm−2的样本占比最高(36%), 对应玉米种植密度为3.75万~6.75万株∙hm−2。4)从品种来看, 黄淮海地区大豆品种选择最多的为‘郓豆1号’ ‘齐黄34’和‘冀豆12’; 玉米品种为‘黄金粮MY73’ ‘良玉99’和‘登海605’。西北地区大豆品种选择最多的为‘东豆339’ ‘中黄13’和‘齐黄34’, 玉米品种为‘优迪919’ ‘先玉1483’和‘登海605’。西南地区大豆品种选择最多的为‘齐黄34’ ‘黔豆12’和‘滇大豆2号’, 玉米品种为‘川单99’ ‘先玉1171’和‘成单716’。本研究为全国大豆玉米带状复合种植进一步研究及推广提供了良好的研究基础。

     

    Abstract: China’s soybean industry is heavily dependent on imports, as limited domestic production capacity restricts industry development and poses risks to national food security. Enhancing soybean production capacity is therefore essential to improving supply-demand self-sufficiency. As a key agronomic technology promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs in recent years, soybean-maize strip intercropping plays a critical role in expanding soybean cultivation areas and increasing yields. This study is based on 1012 valid questionnaires collected in 2024 from a nationwide survey on soybean-maize strip intercropping conducted across 19 provinces (municipalities and autonomous regions). This study systematically analyzes the yields of soybeans and maize, planting costs, economic benefits, the land equivalent ratio (LER), as well as the effects of planting row ratios, densities, and varieties on yields. Results show that the national average yields were 1642 and 6916 kg∙hm−2 for soybeans and maize, respectively. The combined yield of soybean and maize in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region was 9 905 kg∙hm−2, which were 13% and 45% higher than those in the Northwest and Southwest regions, respectively. The national average LER was 1.55, ranging from 1.42 to 1.70. The highest LER was observed in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region (1.63), followed by the Southwest (1.56) and Northwest (1.55) regions. Regarding planting row ratios, the 6∶4 soybean to maize configuration was most common in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region, accounting for 39% of cases. Under this ratio, the proportion of soybean planting density of 1.28×105−1.50×105 plants∙hm−2 was the highest (40%), with a corresponding maize density of 4.2×104−1.05×105 plants∙hm−2. In the Northwest Region, the 4∶4 ratio was dominant (35%), with soybean density of 12.75×104−1.5×105 plants∙hm−2 (48%) and corresponding maize densities of 3.75×104−8.25×104 plants∙hm−2. In the Southwest Region, the 3∶2 ratio was the most prevalent, with the proportion of 60%, where soybean planting densities of 1.05×105−12.45×104 plants∙hm−2 (36%) and maize planting densities of 3.75×104−6.75×104 plants∙hm−2 were most common. Cultivar selection also varied by region. ‘Yundou 1’ had the highest percentage in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region, followed by ‘Qihuang 34’ and ‘Jidou 12’. ‘Huangjinliang MY73’ had the highest percentage for maize cultivar in this region, followed by ‘Liangyu 99’ and ‘Denghai 605’. ‘Dongdou 339’ had the highest percentage for soybean cultivar in the Northwest Region, followed by ‘Zhonghuang 13’ and ‘Qihuang 34’; ‘Youdi 919’ ‘Xianyu 1483’, and ‘Denghai 605’ were the first three maize cultivars in the Northwest Region. ‘Qihuang 34’ had the highest percentage for soybean cultivar in the Southwest Region, followed by ‘Qiandou 12’ and ‘Diandadou 2’. ‘Chuandan 99’ ‘Xianyu 1171’, and ‘Chengdan 716’ were the first three maize cultivars in the Southwest Region. Overall, this study provides important empirical evidence to support further development and technological extension of soybean-maize strip intercropping systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回