近二十年农用地整治区生态质量时空差异及驱动因素以重庆市綦江区267个项目为例

Spatiotemporal variations in ecological quality and driving factors in agricultural land consolidation areas over the past 20 years: A case study of 267 projects in Qijiang District, Chongqing

  • 摘要: 生态转型是新时期全域土地综合整治的重要方向, 识别农用地整治生态质量时空分异特征是规划决策的基础。以重庆市綦江区267个农用地整治项目为研究对象, 基于遥感生态指数(RSEI)模型, 探讨2000—2020年项目区生态质量时空分异格局和动态过程, 对比分析不同整治次数下项目区的生态质量特征, 并揭示农用地整治项目区生态质量差异的原因。结果表明: 1)近二十年来綦江区农用地整治项目区生态环境质量整体较好, 且RSEI表现出先降后升、整体提高的“V”形趋势。从长时序角度来看, 农用地整治对区域生态质量具有显著的正向推动作用; 从不同整治时段角度来看, 第1期(2000—2010年)项目的实施对区域生态环境造成了一定干扰, 第2期(2011—2015年)与第3期(2016—2020年)项目的实施则促进了项目区生态质量优化; 从农用地整治项目实施年份来看, 项目在实施后5、10和15 a生态质量呈现出不断优化的趋势, 表明农用地整治工程会对区域生态环境的恢复与优化产生持续而深远的影响。2) 2000—2020年267个项目区生态质量以良好为主, 区域面积占项目区总面积的55%以上, 劣等与差等区域面积占比低于3%。从不同整治时段来看, 第1期项目导致大量优等和良好生态质量区域退化; 第2期和第3期项目则通过优化中等和良好区域, 促进了区域生态环境改善。3)农用地整治次数与项目区生态质量具有正相关关系, 即同一区域农用地整治次数越多, 生态质量改善越显著。4)农用地整治项目区生态质量变化是由自然因素和社会经济因素共同作用的结果, 其中第1期项目主要由建设规模和新增耕地面积驱动, 第2期和第3期项目则主要受到项目类型与海拔的交互作用影响。研究结果强化了对农用地整治项目区生态质量变化的认识, 为丘陵山区农用地整治工作的开展与生态监测提供了一定借鉴参考。

     

    Abstract: Understanding the spatial and temporal differentiation of ecological quality in the context of agricultural land consolidation is essential for effective planning and decision-making. In this study, the spatial and temporal differentiation patterns and dynamic processes of ecological quality within the project area (267 agricultural land consolidation projects in the Qijiang District of Chongqing City) were investigated from 2000 to 2020 using a Remote Sensing-based Ecological Index (RSEI) model. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the ecological quality characteristics of the project area in relation to varying frequencies of consolidation, thereby elucidating the factors contributing to the observed disparities in ecological quality across the agricultural land consolidation project sites. The results show that: 1) Over the past two decades, the ecological quality in the agricultural land consolidation project area of Qijiang District has been generally good, with the RSEI showing a "V" shaped trend, first declining and then rising, resulting in an overall improvement. Long-term agricultural land consolidation has a significant positive impact on regional ecological quality. During Phase 1 (2000–2010), some disturbance to the regional ecological environment was observed, whereas in Phase 2 (2011–2015) and Phase 3 (2016–2020) ecological quality was promoted. From the perspective of project implementation, ecological quality showed a continuous optimization trend at 5, 10, and 15 a post-implementation, highlighting the lasting and profound impact of agricultural land consolidation projects on regional ecological restoration and optimization. 2) Between 2000 and 2020, 267 project areas demonstrated favorable ecological quality, comprising > 55% of the overall project zone area. By contrast, regions classified as poor or very poor constituted less than 3% of the total area. Analysis of the various consolidation phases revealed that the initial phase of the project resulted in a notable decline in areas characterized by high and good ecological quality. Conversely, the second and third phases contributed to the enhancement of the regional ecological environment by optimizing areas of medium and good quality. 3) The frequency of agricultural land consolidation initiatives was positively correlated with the ecological quality of the respective project area. This indicates that an increase in consolidation efforts within the same region is associated with a more pronounced enhancement in ecological quality. 4) Changes in the ecological quality of the agricultural land consolidation project area result from the combined effects of natural and socioeconomic factors. The first phase of the project was mainly driven by the scale of construction and the increase in arable land area, whereas the second and third phases were primarily influenced by the interaction between project type and altitude. The research outcomes enhance our understanding of alterations in ecological quality within areas designated for agricultural land consolidation projects. These findings serve as valuable references for agricultural land consolidation and ecological monitoring in hilly and mountainous regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回