缓释氮肥减量替代对水稻-小麦/紫云英轮作土壤有机碳组分、碳库管理指数及经济效益的影响

Effects of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer substitution with reduced application rate on soil organic carbon fractions, carbon pool management index, and economic benefits in rice-wheat/Chinese milk vetch rotation systems

  • 摘要: 明确紫云英翻压还田和缓释氮肥减量替代常规氮肥对稻田土壤有机碳(SOC)组分及碳库管理指数(CPMI)的影响与其稳产/增产效应, 可为制定有利于SOC固存和稻田耕地可持续利用的缓释氮肥施用方案提供理论依据。本文以长江中下游平原水稻-小麦和水稻-紫云英两种轮作体系为研究对象, 探讨了紫云英翻压还田和缓释氮肥减量替代常规氮肥对作物产量、经济效益、SOC、活性有机碳和CPMI的影响。试验采用二因素完全随机区组设计, 主因子为轮作体系, 包括水稻-小麦(W-R)和水稻-紫云英(CMV-R); 副因子为氮肥施用方式, 包括常规施氮(CN)、缓释氮肥等氮替代常规氮肥(SRN)以及基于SRN的减氮替代处理水稻季减氮20%和小麦季减氮10% (T1)、水稻季减氮40%和小麦季减氮20% (T2)以及水稻季减氮60%和小麦季减氮30% (T3)。与W-R轮作体系相比, CMV-R轮作体系年均水稻产量显著提高2.1% (P<0.05), 而年均周年净收益却显著降低20.4% (P<0.05)。CMV-R轮作体系总活性有机碳(TLOC)、高活性有机碳(HLOC)、中活性有机碳(MLOC)含量及CPMI较W-R轮作体系分别显著增加5.2%、6.0%、5.1%和6.6% (P<0.05)。与CN处理相比, SRN和T1处理年均水稻产量分别显著增加12.6%和7.3% (P<0.05), 年均周年净收益分别显著增加38.8%和20.7% (P<0.05), 而T3处理年均水稻产量显著降低9.4% (P<0.05)。SRN处理TLOC、HLOC含量和CPMI较CN处理分别显著增加7.1%、6.9%和9.4% (P<0.05)。综合轮作体系和氮肥施用方式, CMV-R轮作体系SRN处理水稻产量、SOC和TLOC含量以及CPMI均高于其余各处理, 其次为W-R轮作体系SRN处理和CMV-R轮作体系T1处理, 且CMV-R轮作体系T1处理与W-R轮作体系SRN处理间无显著差异。因此, 水稻-紫云英轮作体系结合缓释氮肥替代常规氮肥, 甚至在水稻季减量20%替代常规氮肥, 有助于长江中下游平原稻区SOC的固存和稻田耕地的可持续利用。

     

    Abstract: Clarifying the effects of Chinese milk vetch (CMV) incorporation and substitution of conventional nitrogen fertilizers with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on the soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, carbon pool management index (CPMI), and maintenance/increase in rice yield can provide a theoretical basis for formulating application schemes for slow-release nitrogen fertilizers that are conducive to SOC sequestration and sustainable utilization of paddy fields. In this study, the effects of CMV incorporation and substitution of conventional nitrogen fertilizers with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on the crop yield, economic benefit, SOC and labile organic carbon (LOC) content, and CPMI were studied quantitatively in rice-wheat and rice-CMV rotation systems in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and their effects on the maintenance/increase in rice yield were investigated. The experiment adopted a two-factor, completely randomized block design, with the primary factors being the crop rotation systems rice-wheat (W-R) and rice-CMV (CMV-R). The secondary factors were nitrogen fertilizer application methods, including conventional nitrogen fertilizer application (CN), slow-release nitrogen fertilizer substitution for conventional nitrogen fertilizer based on the same nitrogen input (SRN), 20% nitrogen reduction during the rice season and 10% nitrogen reduction during the wheat season based on SRN (T1), 40% nitrogen reduction during the rice season and 20% nitrogen reduction during the wheat season based on SRN (T2), and 60% nitrogen reduction during the rice season and 30% nitrogen reduction during the wheat season based on SRN (T3). Compared with the W-R rotation system, rice yield of the CMV-R rotation system significantly increased by 2.1% (P<0.05), whereas the annual net income significantly decreased by 20.4% (P<0.05). Compared with the W-R rotation system, the total LOC (TLOC), high LOC (HLOC), and medium LOC (MLOC) content as well as the CPMI of the CMV-R rotation system significantly increased by 5.2%, 6.0%, 5.1%, and 6.6% (P<0.05), respectively. Compared with the CN treatment, the rice yields under the SRN and T1 treatments significantly increased by 12.6% and 7.3% (P<0.05), respectively, and annual net incomes significantly increased by 38.8% and 20.7% (P<0.05), respectively, whereas the rice yield under the T3 treatment significantly decreased by 9.4% (P<0.05). Compared with the CN treatment, the TLOC and HLOC content, and CPMI under the SRN treatment significantly increased by 7.1%, 6.9%, and 9.4% (P<0.05), respectively. Based on the crop rotation system and nitrogen fertilizer application method, the rice yield, SOC content, TLOC content, and CPMI under the SRN treatment and the CMV-R rotation system were the highest, followed by the SRN treatment under the W-R rotation system and the T1 treatment under the CMV-R rotation system. No significant difference was found for these indicators between the T1 treatment under the CMV-R rotation system and the SRN treatment under the W-R rotation system. Therefore, in rice-growing regions in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, adopting a rice-CMV rotation system combined with slow-release nitrogen fertilizers to replace conventional nitrogen fertilizer (SRN), and even replacing it with a 20% reduction in the rice season based on SRN, is conducive to SOC sequestration and the sustainable utilization of paddy fields, which is of great significance for sustainable agricultural production in this region.

     

/

返回文章
返回