Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years

ZHANG Xiang; ZHANG Shichao; ZHANG Xuanyun; LIU Jingyu; XUE Xiufeng

doi:10.12357/cjea.20230138

Volume 31 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2023 > 31(10): 1539-1552. > DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138 CSTR: 32371.14.cjea.20230138

ZHANG X, ZHANG S C, ZHANG X Y, LIU J Y, XUE X F. Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(10): 1539−1552. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230138

Citation:

PDF (6613 KB)

Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years

1.
College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
2.
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Land Surface Process and Environmental Remote Sensing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 401331, China

Funds: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971244) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0696).

More Information

Corresponding author:
ZHANG Shichao, E-mail: lintualchao@126.com
Received Date: March 14, 2023
Revised Date: April 20, 2023
Accepted Date: June 06, 2023
Available Online: June 06, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The Yangtze River Economic Belt is the leading demonstration belt for ecological civilization construction, and its spatial and temporal pattern of production-living-ecological space profoundly impacts landscape ecology security and people’s blessedness. Based on the remote sensing monitoring data of land use in 1980, 1990, 2010, and 2020, and considering the corresponding relationship between production-living-ecological space and land use types, this study analyzed the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of landscape ecology security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1980 to 2020 by using a landscape ecology security assessment model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and other methods. And the geographic detectors was usted to explore the impact mechanisms of changes in natural conditions, social economy, and land use. The results showed that: 1) from 1980 to 2020, the land space of the Yangtze River Economic Belt was mainly ecological space, followed by production space and living space. The mutual conversion between production space and ecological space, and production space and living space, were dominant. 2) The overall landscape ecology security level of the production-living-ecological space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1980 to 2020 showed an increasing trend. Among them, the unsafe zones of production space first decreased and then increased slightly; the unsafe zones of living space decreased year by year, whereas the moderately safe zones and safer zones expanded, and the safer zones of ecological space showed a fluctuating upward trend. 3) The spatial differentiation of landscape ecology security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was clear. Among them, the safe zones of production space and living space were mainly distributed in the three major urban clusters in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, whereas the safe zones of ecological space were concentrated in the mountainous areas in the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River, southern Jiangxi and southern Zhejiang. 4) The spatial pattern of landscape ecology security of the production-living-ecological space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt was relatively stable, but the internal regional differences were evident. The high-high aggregation areas were mainly distributed in western Sichuan, western Yunnan, parts of Guizhou, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, and southern Zhejiang, whereas the low-low aggregation areas were mainly distributed in the three major urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. 5) Land use significantly impacted the evolution of landscape ecology security patterns, followed by the social economy and natural conditions. Therefore, we should pay attention to optimizing the layout of the production-living-ecological space to improve the coordinated play of landscape ecology functions and promote the ecological civilization construction and sustainable development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
- Production-living-ecological space,
- Landscape ecological security,
- Land use,
- Geographic detector,
- Yangtze River Economic Belt

FullText(HTML)

References (38)

References

[1]	陈斌, 徐尚昭, 周阳阳, 等. “三生空间”视角下宜昌市景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(4): 344−351 CHEN B, XU S Z, ZHOU Y Y, et al. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of landscape ecological security of Yichang from the perspective of production-life-ecological space[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(4): 344−351
[2]	高彬嫔, 李琛, 吴映梅, 等. 川滇生态屏障区景观生态风险评价及影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1603−1613 GAO B P, LI C, WU Y M, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment and influencing factors in ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan Provinces, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1603−1613
[3]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378−391 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014 HUANG J C, LIN H X, QI X X. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3): 378−391 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.03.014
[4]	武爱彬. 京津冀区域“三生空间”分类评价与格局演变[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(11): 237−242 WU A B. Classification evaluation and pattern evolution of production-living-ecological spaces in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(11): 237−242
[5]	逯承鹏, 纪薇, 刘志良, 等. 黄河流域甘肃段县域“三生”功能空间时空格局及影响因素识别[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(4): 579−588 LU C P, JI W, LIU Z L, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of the “production-living-ecological” functional space of the Yellow River Basin at county level in Gansu, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(4): 579−588
[6]	周昱辰, 尹丹, 黄庆旭, 等. 基于生态系统服务参与式制图的“三生”空间优化建议−以白洋淀流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(8): 1988−2003 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220805 ZHOU Y C, YIN D, HUANG Q X, et al. Spatial optimization based on ecosystem services and the participatory mapping: A case study in Baiyangdian watershed[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(8): 1988−2003 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220805
[7]	刘顺鑫, 黄云. “三生空间”视角下万州区景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(6): 308−316 LIU S X, HUANG Y. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of landscape ecological security of Wanzhou District from the perspective of production-life-ecological space[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(6): 308−316
[8]	JIN X, JIN Y X, MAO X F. Ecological risk assessment of cities on the Tibetan Plateau based on land use land cover changes: Case study of Delingha City[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 101: 185−191 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.050
[9]	雷金睿, 陈宗铸, 陈毅青, 等. 1990—2018年海南岛湿地景观生态安全格局演变[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(2): 293−302 LEI J R, CHEN Z Z, CHEN Y Q, et al. Dynamic analysis of wetland landscape ecological security pattern of Hainan Island in 1990−2018[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(2): 293−302
[10]	乔斌, 曹晓云, 孙玮婕, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的生态分区识别与优化策略−以祁连山国家公园青海片区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3): 986−1004 QIAO B, CAO X Y, SUN W J, et al. Ecological zoning identification and optimization strategies based on ecosystem service value and landscape ecological risk: Taking Qinghai area of Qilian Mountain National Park as an example[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(3): 986−1004
[11]	和春兰, 普军伟, 沈金祥. 2005—2018年澜沧江下游流域景观生态安全时空变化及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(4): 219−227 HE C L, PU J W, SHEN J X. Spatial-temporal changes and driving mechanisms of landscape ecological security in lower reaches of Lancang River during 2005−2018[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 219−227
[12]	SALVATI L, FORINO G. A ‘laboratory’ of landscape degradation: social and economic implications for sustainable development in peri-urban areas[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2014, 8: 232−249 doi: 10.1504/IJISD.2014.066616
[13]	谢余初, 巩杰, 张玲玲. 基于PSR模型的白龙江流域景观生态安全时空变化[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(6): 790−797 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.06.016 XIE Y C, GONG J, ZHANG L L. Dynamics of landscape ecological security based on PSR model in the Bailongjiang River watershed[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(6): 790−797 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.06.016
[14]	陈晶晶, 李天宏. 基于PSR模型和投影寻踪法的荆州市景观生态风险评价[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 53(4): 731−740 CHEN J J, LI T H. Landscape ecological risk analysis for Jingzhou City based on PSR model and projection pursuit method[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2017, 53(4): 731−740
[15]	LUDWIG J A, BASTIN G N, CHEWINGS V H, et al. Leakiness: A new index for monitoring the health of arid and semiarid landscapes using remotely sensed vegetation cover and elevation data[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2007, 7(2): 442−454 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.05.001
[16]	LIN M X, LIN T, SUN C G, et al. Using the eco-erosion index to assess regional ecological stress due to urbanization: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 111: 106028 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106028
[17]	施馨雨, 赵筱青, 普军伟, 等. 基于斑块尺度的云南省景观生态安全时空演变及归因[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(20): 8087−8098 SHI X Y, ZHAO X Q, PU J W, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and attribution of Landscape Ecological Security at patch scale in Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(20): 8087−8098
[18]	王媛, 周长威. 黔中城市群景观生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(9): 1111−1117 WANG Y, ZHOU C W. Landscape ecological security pattern in central Guizhou urban agglomeration[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35(9): 1111−1117
[19]	于淑会, 康园园, 邓伟, 等. 太行山东部县域“三生”用地转型与景观生态风险分析−以河北省平山县为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(7): 1113−1122 YU S H, KANG Y Y, DENG W, et al. Analysis of “Production-Living-Ecological” land transformation and landscape ecological risk in the eastern counties of the Taihang Mountain: a case study in Pingshan County[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(7): 1113−1122
[20]	武泽民, 余哲修, 李瑶, 等. 滇池流域土地利用演变及景观生态安全评价研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(3): 122−129 WU Z M, YU Z X, LI Y, et al. The study of land use evolution and landscape ecological security evaluation in Dianchi Lake basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 41(3): 122−129
[21]	陈昆仑, 齐漫, 王旭, 等. 1995—2015年武汉城市湖泊景观生态安全格局演化[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(5): 1725−1734 CHEN K L, QI M, WANG X, et al. Study of urban lake landscape ecological security pattern evolution in Wuhan, 1995—2015[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(5): 1725−1734
[22]	袁大鹏, 陈奇乐, 石垚, 等. 河北典型样带土地利用生态安全格局研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(11): 1767−1778 YUAN D P, CHEN Q L, SHI Y, et al. Ecological security pattern of land use in a typical transect of Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(11): 1767−1778
[23]	王权, 唐芳, 李阳兵, 等. 岩溶地区景观格局演变及其生态安全的时空分异−以贵州省东北部槽谷为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(18): 7273−7291 WANG Q, TANG F, LI Y B, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation of landscape pattern evolution and its ecological security in Karst areas: a case study of trough valley in northeast Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(18): 7273−7291
[24]	向姣姣. 长江经济带高质量发展的历程、挑战和实践路向[J]. 决策与信息, 2021(10): 71−77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8129.2021.10.011 XIANG J J. The course, challenges and practical directions of the high-quality development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Decision & Information, 2021(10): 71−77 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8129.2021.10.011
[25]	刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 39(1): 3−14 LIU J Y, KUANG W H, ZHANG Z X, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 39(1): 3−14
[26]	宋永永, 薛东前, 夏四友, 等. 近40a黄河流域国土空间格局变化特征与形成机理[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(5): 1445−1463 doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191065 SONG Y Y, XUE D Q, XIA S Y, et al. Change characteristics and formation mechanism of the territorial spatial pattern in the Yellow River Basin from 1980 to 2018, China[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(5): 1445−1463 doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191065
[27]	刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(07): 1290−1304 LIU J L, LIU Y S, LI Y R. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of “production-living-ecological” spaces in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(07): 1290−1304
[28]	王飞, 叶长盛, 华吉庆, 等. 南昌市城镇空间扩展与景观生态风险的耦合关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1248−1262 WANG F, YE C S, HUA J Q, et al. Coupling relationship between urban spatial expansion and landscape ecological risk in Nanchang City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1248−1262
[29]	韩振华, 李建东, 殷红, 等. 基于景观格局的辽河三角洲湿地生态安全分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(3): 701−705 HAN Z H, LI J D, YIN H, et al. Analysis of ecological security of wetland in Liaohe River delta based on the landscape pattern[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(3): 701−705
[30]	郑可君, 李琛, 吴映梅, 等. 云南边境山区景观生态风险时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(18): 7458−7469 ZHENG K J, LI C, WU Y M, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of landscape ecological risk and influential factors in Yunnan border mountainous area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(18): 7458−7469
[31]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116−134 WANG J F, XU C D. Geodetector: principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116−134
[32]	马小雪, 吴昊, 秦伯强, 等. 长江经济带景观格局动态演变及其景观生态环境效应[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(10): 1706−1716 MA X X, WU H, QIN B Q, et al. Spatiotemporal change of landscape pattern and its eco-environmental response in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(10): 1706−1716
[33]	史娜娜, 肖能文, 王琦, 等. 长江经济带生态系统格局特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(11): 1779−1789 SHI N N, XIAO N W, WANG Q, et al. Spatial pattern of ecosystems and the driving forces in the Yangtze River Economic Zone[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(11): 1779−1789
[34]	苑韶峰, 唐奕钰, 申屠楚宁. 土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应−基于长江经济带127个地级市的实证研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9): 174−181 YUAN S F, TANG Y Y, SHENTU C N. Spatiotemporal change of land-use transformation and its eco-environmental response: A case of 127 counties in Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9): 174−181
[35]	黄晶, 薛东前, 董朝阳, 等. 干旱绿洲农业区土地利用转型生态环境效应及分异机制−基于三生空间主导功能判别视角[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(11): 2044−2060 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.11.005 HUANG J, XUE D Q, DONG C Y, et al. Eco-environmental effects and spatial differentiation mechanism of land use transition in agricultural areas of arid oasis: a perspective based on the dominant function of production-living-ecological spaces[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(11): 2044−2060 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.11.005
[36]	翟玉鑫, 张飞云, 马丽娜. 近40年新疆三生用地转型及其生态环境效应演变[J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(3): 514−523 ZHAI Y X, ZHANG F Y, MA L N. Changes of production-living-ecology land transformation and eco-environmental effects in Xinjiang in last 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(3): 514−523
[37]	孙善良, 张小平. 陕西省土地利用转型时空演变及其生态环境效应分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6): 356−363, 370 SUN S L, ZHANG X P. Analysis on the spatiotemporal evolution of land use transformation and its ecological environment effect in Shaanxi Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6): 356−363, 370
[38]	时卉, 杨兆萍, 韩芳, 等. 新疆天池景区生态安全度时空分异特征与驱动机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(3): 475−485 doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.03.017 SHI H, YANG Z P, HAN F. Characteristics of temporal-spatial differences in landscape ecological security and the driving mechanism in Tianchi scenic zone of Xinjiang[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(3): 475−485 doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.03.017

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	杨新刚，焦祎. 城市建成区用地混合空间格局研究——以合肥市为例. 未来城市设计与运营. 2025(01): 6-10 .
2.	巩小维，周冬梅，张军，罗世玉，陈建坤，高雅娟. “三生空间”视角下庆阳市景观生态风险评价及耦合协调度. 干旱区研究. 2025(03): 556-567 .
3.	邹永偲，兰安军，范泽孟，陶倩，钱方艳. “三生空间”视角下贵州省景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析. 水土保持研究. 2024(03): 432-442 .
4.	黄博，张海文. 关中平原城市群景观生态风险演变及驱动力分析. 环境生态学. 2024(06): 40-48 .
5.	黄书苑，傅一敏，章语嫣，杨建州. 长江流域水-能源-粮食-森林系统耦合协调发展研究. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2024(07): 1193-1205 . 本站查看
6.	王友凤. 陕北府谷县景观生态风险评价及其耦合特征分析. 环境生态学. 2024(09): 23-32 .
7.	何文，余玲，王金叶，姚月锋，李宁，黄金君. 漓江流域景观生态安全评价及其影响因素分析. 广西科学. 2024(06): 1132-1143 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (642) PDF downloads (76) Cited by(8)

Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Export File

Citation

Format

Content