An indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services

GUO Yujia; LIU Shiliang; DONG Yuhong; LIU Jiaju; LI Weishan

doi:10.12357/cjea.20230079

Volume 31 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture > 2023 > 31(10): 1525-1538. > DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230079 CSTR: 32371.14.cjea.20230079

GUO Y J, LIU S L, DONG Y H, LIU J J, LI W S. An indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(10): 1525−1538. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230079

Citation:

PDF (4224 KB)

An indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services

1.
Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering, Cangzhou 061016, China
2.
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100088, China
3.
Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
4.
Research Center for Comprehensive Treatment of River Basin Water Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Funds: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2022YFF1303204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42271097), and the Basic Research Funds of Provincial Universities of the Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering (SYKY2210).

More Information

Corresponding author:
LIU Shiliang, E-mail: shiliangliu@bnu.edu.cn
Received Date: February 15, 2023
Accepted Date: June 12, 2023
Available Online: July 12, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Implementing territorial ecological protection and restoration projects is important for promoting the China’s ecological civilization construction and ensuring national ecological security. China has actively explored and coordinated the integrated protection and restoration of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands, and several important ecological protection and restoration projects at both the national and local levels since 2012. As an important component of territorial ecological protection and restoration, ecological corridors, which are zonal areas in the ecological environment, can effectively form regional-scale ecological networks to ensure regional ecological security. After the completion of projects, it is of great practical importance to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of ecological restoration projects and analyze changes in ecological conditions before and after construction to improve ecological restoration work and optimize ecological safety barrier systems. However, there are several problems with the existing effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor construction, such as a single evaluation objective, an incomplete evaluation indicator system, lack of principles of landscape ecology, and lack of evaluation of ecological restoration projects at different scales. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish a systematic and comprehensive indicator system to evaluate the effectiveness of ecological corridor restoration. This study integrated ecosystem services indicators and proposed an indicator system for comprehensive effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on Pattern-Quality-Service. According to the characteristics of the ecological corridor, the effectiveness evaluation involved four dimensions: landscape patterns, biodiversity, habitat, and ecosystem services. These important evaluation points were determined at the project and ecological protection and restoration unit scales. By means of frequency analysis, expert consultation, and other methods, taking the improvement of ecosystem services as the restoration goal and referring to the existing specifications, the specific indicators that could objectively reflect the ecological restoration benefits of the project were screened. A comprehensive indicator system with clear quantitative methods and evaluation criteria was developed. The evaluation indicator system included four project layers, namely landscape pattern optimization, biodiversity conservation, habitat conservation and construction, and ecosystem service improvement, as well as 15 criteria layers and 41 indicators. Considering the integrated protection and restoration of various ecological elements in different regions, the evaluation indicators were divided into restrictive and recommended indicators, which were applied to common integral and individual optional conditions in the projects, respectively. Classifying these two indicators can enhance the flexibility of the evaluation indicator system and expand its applicability. In practice, the selection of evaluation indicators for the effectiveness of ecological restoration projects should be combined with the actual situation of the project based on this indicator system and common indicators should be selected for evaluation. Based on the evaluation results, ecological protection, and restoration work can be adjusted and corrected. In general, this study can better realize the ecological benefits of ecological corridors restoration and promote the construction practice of such ecological corridors. It could also provide a scientific reference and theoretical support for the planning, construction, implementation, and followup management of future territorial ecological restoration.
- Ecological corridor,
- Restoration effectiveness,
- Evaluation indicator system,
- Landscape pattern,
- Ecosystem services

FullText(HTML)

References (54)

References

[1]	彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407−419 PENG J, ZHAO H J, LIU Y X, et al. Research progress and prospect on regional ecological security pattern construction[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 407−419
[2]	冯琰玮, 甄江红, 田桐羽. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间保护修复优化−以内蒙古呼包鄂地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(11): 2915−2929 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221111 FENG Y W, ZHEN J H, TIAN T Y. Optimization of land protection and restoration based on ecological security pattern: A case study of Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos Region in Inner Mongolia[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(11): 2915−2929 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20221111
[3]	DAI L, LIU Y B, LUO X Y. Integrating the MCR and DOI models to construct an ecological security network for the urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 754: 141868 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141868
[4]	李少帅, 卢丽华. 生态保护修复工程实施成效评估的构想[J]. 中国土地, 2022(3): 12−15 doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.ISSN1002-9729.2022.03.04 LI S S, LU L H. Conception of effectiveness evaluation of ecological protection and restoration project[J]. China Land, 2022(3): 12−15 doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.ISSN1002-9729.2022.03.04
[5]	罗明, 于恩逸, 周妍, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复试点工程布局及技术策略[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8692−8701 LUO M, YU E Y, ZHOU Y, et al. Distribution and technical strategies of ecological protection and restoration projects for mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(23): 8692−8701
[6]	张馨怡, 魏东斌, 杜宇国. 再生水水质稳定性评价指标与体系[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(2): 586−596 doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202105276 ZHANG X Y, WEI D B, DU Y G. Evaluation parameters and system for reclaimed water quality stability[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(2): 586−596 doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202105276
[7]	赵瑞, 吴克宁, 刘亚男, 等. 基于生态系统服务功能视角的县域尺度土壤健康评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(2): 269−279 ZHAO R, WU K N, LIU Y N, et al. Soil health evaluation at a county level based on soil ecosystem service function[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2020, 51(2): 269−279
[8]	刘浩, 崔岳铭, 王磊, 等. 北京市城镇化地区植物多样性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(8): 48−55 doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210257 LIU H, CUI Y M, WANG L, et al. Evaluation on plant diversity in urbanization area of Beijing City[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44(8): 48−55 doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210257
[9]	夏舫, 李伟, 王博宇, 等. 北京市海淀区重要湿地生态质量评估分析[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2022, 18(5): 33−36 XIA F, LI W, WANG B Y, et al. Assessment of ecological quality of important wetlands in Haidian District, Beijing[J]. Wetland Science & Management, 2022, 18(5): 33−36
[10]	曹欠欠, 王兴科. 河流生态修复效果评价指标体系研究[J]. 环保科技, 2014, 20(2): 24−30 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0254.2014.02.008 CAO Q Q, WANG X K. Study on the evaluation index system of river ecological restoration[J]. Environmental Protection and Technology, 2014, 20(2): 24−30 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0254.2014.02.008
[11]	杜文武, 卿腊梅, 吴宇航, 等. 公园城市理念下森林生态系统服务功能提升[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(10): 43−50 DU W W, QING L M, WU Y H, et al. Improving forest ecosystem services under park city concept[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2020, 27(10): 43−50
[12]	刘世梁, 孙永秀, 赵海迪, 等. 基于多源数据的三江源区生态工程建设前后草地动态变化及驱动因素研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 3865−3877 LIU S L, SUN Y X, ZHAO H D, et al. Grassland dynamics and their driving factors associated with ecological construction projects in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on multi-source data[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 3865−3877
[13]	史芳宁, 刘世梁, 安毅, 等. 城市化背景下景观破碎化及连接度动态变化研究−以昆明市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3303−3314 SHI F N, LIU S L, AN Y, et al. Changes of landscape fragmentation and connectivity with urbanization: a case study of Kunming City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3303−3314
[14]	胡一帆, 王浩, 焦磊, 等. 青藏高原重大建设工程生态修复综合效益评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(18): 7565−7576 HU Y F, WANG H, JIAO L, et al. Evaluation index system of comprehensive benefits of ecological restoration of major construction projects on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(18): 7565−7576
[15]	刘浩, 郝海广, 张文国, 等. 基于格局-质量-服务的生态保护修复成效评估: 以额尔齐斯河流域为例[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(11): 2495−2507 LIU H, HAO H G, ZHANG W G, et al. Evaluation of ecological protection and restoration effectiveness based on ‘pattern-quality-service’ in Irtysh River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(11): 2495−2507
[16]	傅伯杰. 国土空间生态修复亟待把握的几个要点[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(1): 64−69 FU B J. Several key points in territorial ecological restoration[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(1): 64−69
[17]	李双成, 刘金龙, 张才玉, 等. 生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(12): 1618−1630 LI S C, LIU J L, ZHANG C Y, et al. The research trends of ecosystem services and the paradigm in geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(12): 1618−1630
[18]	彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 3−13 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102 PENG J, LYU D N, DONG J Q, et al. Processes coupling and spatial integration: characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 3−13 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102
[19]	HILTY J, WORBOYS G L, KEELEY A, et al. Guidelines for Conserving Connectivity through Ecological Networks and Corridors[M]. Gran: IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2020
[20]	FREMIER A K, KIPARSKY M, GMUR S, et al. A riparian conservation network for ecological resilience[J]. Biological Conservation, 2015, 191: 29−37 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.029
[21]	LI S C, XIAO W, ZHAO Y L, et al. Incorporating ecological risk index in the multi-process MCRE model to optimize the ecological security pattern in a semi-arid area with intensive coal mining: A case study in Northern China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 247: 119143 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119143
[22]	FU Y J, SHI X Y, HE J, et al. Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern: A case study in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112: 106030 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106030
[23]	PENG J, PAN Y J, LIU Y X, et al. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 110−124 doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010
[24]	邓金杰, 陈柳新, 杨成韫, 等. 高度城市化地区生态廊道重要性评价探索−以深圳为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 573−582 DENG J J, CHEN L X, YANG C Y, et al. Significance evaluation of ecological corridor in an highly-urbanized areas: A case study of Shenzhen[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(3): 573−582
[25]	生态环境部. 生态保护红线划定指南[EB/OL]. (2017-05-27)[2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/W020170728397753220005.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Guidelines for Delineation of Ecological Conservation Redline[EB/OL]. (2017-05-27)[2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201707/W020170728397753220005.pdf
[26]	丽水市市场监督管理局. 国家公园生态廊道建设规范[EB/OL]. (2021-12-08)[2023-01-23]. https://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3707/site/attach/0/73eeb754d0a5489d9cd8dcf648563da7.pdf Lishui Municipal Administration of Market Supervision. Construction Specification of National Park Ecological Corridor[EB/OL]. (2021-12-08)[2023-01-23]. https://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3707/site/attach/0/73eeb754d0a5489d9cd8dcf648563da7.pdf
[27]	郝喆, 曹明杰, 杨青潮. 尾矿库生态退化区修复效果评价[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2019, 39(10): 143−147 HAO Z, CAO M J, YANG Q C. Evaluation on remediation effect of ecological degradation area of tailings pond[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2019, 39(10): 143−147
[28]	朱晓博. 城市河流生态修复效果评价——以北京市永定河为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015 ZHU X B. Evaluation of ecological restoration effect of urban rivers—A case study of Yongding River in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015
[29]	邵全琴, 樊江文, 刘纪远, 等. 三江源生态保护和建设一期工程生态成效评估[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 3−20 SHAO Q Q, FAN J W, LIU J Y, et al. Assessment on the effects of the first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Sanjiangyuan region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 3−20
[30]	廖雨辰, 谢雨, 刘俊雁, 等. 九寨沟自然保护区生态安全动态评价及障碍因子[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(15): 5950−5960 LIAO Y C, XIE Y, LIU J Y, et al. Ecological security dynamic assessment and obstacle factors analysis in Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(15): 5950−5960
[31]	李鹍. 基于遥感图像解译的城市生态廊道研究[J]. 工程图学学报, 2010, 31(6): 161−164 LI K. Research on city ecological tunnel based on remote sensing image interpretation[J]. Journal of Engineering Graphics, 2010, 31(6): 161−164
[32]	赵士洞, 张永民, 赖鹏飞. 千年生态系统评估报告集(一)[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007 ZHAO S D, ZHANG Y M, LAI P F. Report Set of Millennium Eeosystem Assessment (Ⅰ)[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2007
[33]	刘纪远, 邵全琴, 樊江文. 三江源区草地生态系统综合评估指标体系[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(2): 273−283 LIU J Y, SHAO Q Q, FAN J W. The integrated assessment indicator system of grassland ecosystem in the Three-River Headwaters region[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(2): 273−283
[34]	FÁBOS J G. Greenway planning in the United States: its origins and recent case studies[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 68(2/3): 321−342
[35]	JONGMAN R H G. Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 32(3): 169−183 doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)00197-O
[36]	傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠. 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 341−348 FU B J, YU D D, LYU N. An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 341−348
[37]	毛萍, 赵鹤凌, 张轶佳, 等. 生态环境中的人类福祉研究热点问题分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2022, 44(6): 799−812 MAO P, ZHAO H L, ZHANG Y J, et al. Analysis of hot topics of human well-beings in ecological environment[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2022, 44(6): 799−812
[38]	生态环境部. HJ 623-2011 区域生物多样性评价标准[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/201109/W020120130517017975940.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. HJ 623-2011 Standard for the Assessment of Regional Biodiversity[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/201109/W020120130517017975940.pdf
[39]	汪松, 解焱. 中国物种红色名录-第一卷-红色名录: [中英文本][M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004 WANG S, XIE Y. China Species Red List[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004
[40]	生态环境部. 关于发布全国生物物种资源调查相关技术规定(试行)的公告[EB/OL]. (2010-03-04)[2023-02-05]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201004/t20100428_188866.htm Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Announcement on the release of the relevant technical regulations on the national survey of biological species resources (trial) [EB/OL]. (2010-03-04)[2023-02-05]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201004/t20100428_188866.htm
[41]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB/T 50563—2010 城市园林绿化评价标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010 Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. GB/T 50563—2010 Evaluation Standard for Urban Landscaping and Greening[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010
[42]	水利部. SL 709—2015 河湖生态保护与修复规划导则[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015 Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. SL 709—2015 Technical Guidelines for Ecological Restoration of Riparian Buffers of Rivers and Lakes[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2015
[43]	生态环境部. HJ 192—2015 生态环境状况评价技术规范[EB/OL]. [2023-01-28]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/201503/W020150326489785523925.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. HJ 192—2015 Technical Criterion for Ecosystem Status Evaluation[EB/OL]. [2023-01-28]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/201503/W020150326489785523925.pdf
[44]	生态环境部. 河湖生态缓冲带保护修复技术指南[EB/OL]. (2021-12-04)[2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202112/W020211215541263714758.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Guidelines for Ecological Restoration of Riparian Buffers of Rivers and Lakes[EB/OL]. (2021-12-04)[2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202112/W020211215541263714758.pdf
[45]	刘世梁, 赵爽, 成方妍, 等. 市域尺度两种生态系统服务评价方法对比研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(9): 1315−1323 LIU S L, ZHAO S, CHENG F Y, et al. Comparative study on two evaluating methods of ecosystem services at city-scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(9): 1315−1323
[46]	张金婷, 孙华. 内梅罗指数法和模糊综合评价法在土壤重金属污染评价应用中的差异分析[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2016, 28(4): 27−31 ZHANG J T, SUN H. Differences of Nemerow index method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in evaluation heavy metal pollution in soil[J]. The Administration and Technique of Environmental Monitoring, 2016, 28(4): 27−31
[47]	生态环境部. GB 15618—2018 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/trhj/201807/W020190626595212456114.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. GB 15618—2018 Soil Environmental Quality-Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agricultural Land (trial)[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/trhj/201807/W020190626595212456114.pdf
[48]	生态环境部. GB 36600—2018 土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/trhj/201807/W020190626596188930731.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. GB 36600−2018 Soil Environmental Quality-Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Development Land (Trial)[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/trhj/201807/W020190626596188930731.pdf
[49]	生态环境部. GB 3838—2002 地表水环境质量标准[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/shjbh/shjzlbz/200206/W020061027509896672057.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. GB 3838—2002 Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard[S/OL]. [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/shjbh/shjzlbz/200206/W020061027509896672057.pdf
[50]	生态环境部. 全国生态状况调查评估技术规范——生态系统服务功能评估[EB/OL]. [2023-02-05]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/202106/W020210910457959297347.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Specification for Investigation and Assessment of National Ecological Status—Ecosystem Services Assessment[EB/OL]. [2023-02-05]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/stzl/202106/W020210910457959297347.pdf
[51]	生态环境部. 区域生态质量评价办法(试行)[EB/OL]. (2021.10.17)[2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202111/W020211124377111066485.pdf Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Measures for Regional Ecological Quality Evaluation (Trial)[EB/OL]. (2021.10.17) [2023-01-11]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202111/W020211124377111066485.pdf
[52]	李淑娟, 郑鑫, 隋玉正. 国内外生态修复效果评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 4240−4249 LI S J, ZHENG X, SUI Y Z. Research progress on evaluation of ecological restoration effect at home and abroad[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 4240−4249
[53]	史小红, 赵胜男, 孙标, 等. 呼伦贝尔市湿地生态系统固碳量与碳汇潜力评估[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015(10): 26−30, 34 SHI X H, ZHAO S N, SUN B, et al. The carbon storage and potential carbon sequestration of wetland ecosystem in Hulunbuir City[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015(10): 26−30, 34
[54]	孙晓萌, 彭本荣. 中国生态修复成效评估方法研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2014, 39(7): 153−157 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2014.07.041 SUN X M, PENG B R. Evaluating ecological restoration success in China: a review of the literature[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2014, 39(7): 153−157 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2014.07.041

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (831) PDF downloads (196)

An indicator system for effectiveness evaluation of ecological corridor restoration based on landscape patterns and ecosystem services

Abstract

References

Catalog

Article Metrics

Export File

Citation

Format

Content