Volume 31 Issue 9
Sep.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
MENG F D, ZHOU Z, ZHANG G J, JIAO C L, KAN Y C, ZHAO L. Land space ecological restoration zoning based on ecosystem service supply and demand and ecological resilience: a case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(9): 1496−1510. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230010
Citation: MENG F D, ZHOU Z, ZHANG G J, JIAO C L, KAN Y C, ZHAO L. Land space ecological restoration zoning based on ecosystem service supply and demand and ecological resilience: a case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2023, 31(9): 1496−1510. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20230010
shu

Land space ecological restoration zoning based on ecosystem service supply and demand and ecological resilience: a case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

  • 1.

    Land and Resources College, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China

  • 2.

    Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Environment, Baoding 071000, China

  • 3.

    Baoding Branch of Central Agricultural Broadcasting School, Baoding 071000, China

Funds: The study was supported by Hebei Social Science Development Research Project (20210201298).
More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    ZHOU Zhi, E-mail: zhouzhi797825@163.com

  • Received Date: January 04, 2023
  • Accepted Date: May 10, 2023
  • Available Online: June 05, 2023
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • It is important to explore the coupling relationship between the supply and demand characteristics of ecosystem services and the attributes of ecological resilience, and to scientifically delineate the ecological restoration zones in the national land space for ecological security and regional sustainable development. This study took districts and counties of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei as the study unit. Based on multi-source data, the food production model, InVEST model, CSLE model, and other methods were used to measure the supply and demand of five ecosystem services, including food supply, water yield, carbon storage, soil conservation, and recreation supply. An ecological resilience evaluation index system was constructed to measure the ecological resilience of counties (districts). Based on the ecosystem service supply and demand as well as ecological resilience, the ecological restoration zones were delineated, and the corresponding optimization strategies were proposed according to the natural and socio-economic status and development characteristics within the zones. The results showed that: 1) the high-value areas of the ecosystem service supply in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region were mainly distributed in the northern part of Chengde City, Qinhuangdao City, and Tangshan City, and scattered in the central counties (districts) of the region. The high-value areas of ecosystem service demand were mainly concentrated in the well-developed cities in the central and southeastern Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, whereas the demand for ecosystem services in the mountainous areas and plateaus in the northern Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was low. The supply and demand of ecosystem services in the study area were spatially negatively correlated. 2) The ecological resilience of each district and county had noticeable regional differences, and the high-value areas were mainly concentrated in the northeast of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. 3) There was no high surplus area in the comprehensive supply and demand of ecosystem services in the study area. The deficit area accounted for 42.26% of the total area, mainly resulting from the decline in system function caused by urban and industrial development, and the demand for ecological services was challenging to meet. 4) Based on the matching characteristics of the supply and demand of ecosystem services and the spatial distribution pattern of ecological resilience, the study area was divided into high supply-high demand-high resilience (13.68%), low supply-high demand-low resilience (0.51%), low supply-high demand-high resilience (10.54%), low supply-low demand-low resilience (12.07%), low supply-low demand-high resilience (20.22%), and high supply-low demand-high resilience (42.98%) areas. At the same time, different ecological restoration strategies were proposed for different areas. This study provides guidance for the systematic layout of ecological restoration projects and a methodological reference for the scientific preparation of comprehensive land space consolidation plans.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (41)
  • [1]
    许闯胜, 刘伟, 宋伟, 等. 差异化开展国土空间生态修复的思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 384−394 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210209

    XU C S, LIU W, SONG W, et al. Thoughts on differentially carrying out land ecological restoration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(2): 384−394 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210209
    [2]
    李玉强, 陈云, 曹雯婕, 等. 全球变化对资源环境及生态系统影响的生态学理论基础[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 603−612

    LI Y Q, CHEN Y, CAO W J, et al. Theoretical basis of ecology for the influence of global change on resources, environment, and ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3): 603−612
    [3]
    彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 3−13 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102

    PENG J, LYU D N, DONG J Q, et al. Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 3−13 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102
    [4]
    曹宇, 王嘉怡, 李国煜. 国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(7): 1−10

    CAO Y, WANG J Y, LI G Y. Ecological restoration for territorial space: basic concepts and foundations[J]. China Land Science, 2019, 33(7): 1−10
    [5]
    张潆文, 苏腾, 张富刚, 等. 新时期我国国土空间生态修复理念与模式探讨[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1573−1580

    ZHANG Y W, SU T, ZHANG F G, et al. Conception and framework of land ecological restoration for a new stage in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1573−1580
    [6]
    刘彦, 文灵芝. 基于生态安全格局识别的国土空间生态修复分区: 以浏阳市为例[J]. 国土资源导刊, 2021, 18(2): 15−21

    LIU Y, WEN L Z. Regionalization of land spatial ecological restoration based on ecological security pattern identification: taking Liuyang as an example[J]. Land & Resources Herald, 2021, 18(2): 15−21
    [7]
    马世发, 劳春华, 江海燕. 基于生态安全格局理论的国土空间生态修复分区模拟−以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(9): 3441−3448

    MA S F, LAO C H, JIANG H Y. Ecological restoration zoning of territorial space based on the pattern simulation of eco-security scenario: a case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 3441−3448
    [8]
    倪庆琳, 侯湖平, 丁忠义, 等. 基于生态安全格局识别的国土空间生态修复分区−以徐州市贾汪区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 204−216 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200117

    NI Q L, HOU H P, DING Z Y, et al. Ecological remediation zoning of territory based on the ecological security pattern recognition: taking Jiawang District of Xuzhou City as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 204−216 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200117
    [9]
    范余敏, 李向阳, 李梦, 等. 黄河中游三门峡市矿山生态环境承载力分区研究[J]. 自然资源情报, 2022(1): 30−36, 29

    FAN Y M, LI X Y, LI M, et al. Study on the mine ecological environment capacity of different zones in Sanmenxia[J]. Land and Resources Information, 2022(1): 30−36, 29
    [10]
    覃盟琳, 朱梓铭, 胡城旗, 等. 市县国土空间生态修复分区方法与修复策略研究−以崇左市天等县为例[J]. 广西大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 45(4): 802−815

    QIN M L, ZHU Z M, HU C Q, et al. Research on zoning methods and strategies of ecological restoration of territorial space at municipal and county level— A case study of Tiandeng County, Chongzuo City[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 45(4): 802−815
    [11]
    蔡海生, 陈艺, 查东平, 等. 基于主导功能的国土空间生态修复分区的原理与方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 261−270 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.15.032

    CAI H S, CHEN Y, ZHA D P, et al. Principle and method for ecological restoration zoning of territorial space based on the dominant function[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(15): 261−270 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.15.032
    [12]
    田美荣, 高吉喜, 宋国宝, 等. 基于主导生态功能与生态退化程度的生态修复分区研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 7−14

    TIAN M R, GAO J X, SONG G B, et al. Zoning for ecological remediation by dominant ecological function and ecological degradation degree[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2017, 33(1): 7−14
    [13]
    蔡海生, 查东平, 张学玲, 等. 基于主导生态功能的江西省国土空间生态修复分区研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(4): 55−69

    CAI H S, ZHA D P, ZHANG X L, et al. Territorial land zoning for ecological restoration in Jiangxi Province based on dominant ecological function[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(4): 55−69
    [14]
    谢余初, 张素欣, 林冰, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的广西县域国土生态修复空间分区[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 217−229 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200118

    XIE Y C, ZHANG S X, LIN B, et al. Spatial zoning for land ecological consolidation in Guangxi based on the ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 217−229 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200118
    [15]
    岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 149−158

    YUE W Z, HOU L, XIA H X, et al. Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China: based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 149−158
    [16]
    周汝波, 林媚珍, 吴卓. 生态系统服务供需视角下粤港澳大湾区国土空间生态修复分区研究[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43(3): 417−428

    ZHOU R B, LIN M Z, WU Z. Land space ecological restoration zoning in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area from the perspective of supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Tropical Geography, 2023, 43(3): 417−428
    [17]
    高嫄, 原野, 赵艺芳. 基于生态系统服务供需的农牧交错带流域生态修复分区——以桑干河上游为例[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2023, 13(3): 1214–1222

    GAO Y, YUAN Y, ZHAO Y F. Ecological restoration zoning in farming-grazing transitional zone based on the supply and demand of the ecosystem services: a case study of the upper Sanggan River[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2023, 13(3): 1214–1222
    [18]
    刘春芳, 李鹏杰, 刘立程, 等. 西北生态脆弱区省域国土空间生态修复分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(17): 254−263

    LIU C F, LI P J, LIU L C, et al. Ecological restoration zoning of provincial territorial space in the ecologically fragile areas of northwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(17): 254−263
    [19]
    闫海明, 战金艳, 张韬. 生态系统恢复力研究进展综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 303−314 doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.03.005

    YAN H M, ZHAN J Y, ZHANG T. Review of ecosystem resilience research progress[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(3): 303−314 doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.03.005
    [20]
    彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(5): 18−26

    PENG J, LI B, DONG J Q, et al. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(5): 18−26
    [21]
    HASSAN R M, SCHOLES R, ASH N. Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. Covelo: Island Press, 2005
    [22]
    GROTEN S M E. NDVI−Crop monitoring and early yield assessment of Burkina Faso[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(8): 1495−1515 doi: 10.1080/01431169308953983
    [23]
    李瑾璞, 夏少霞, 于秀波, 等. 基于InVEST模型的河北省陆地生态系统碳储量研究[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(7): 854−861

    LI J P, XIA S X, YU X B, et al. Evaluation of carbon storage on terrestrial ecosystem in Hebei Province based on InVEST model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(7): 854−861
    [24]
    王略, 屈创, 赵国栋. 基于中国土壤流失方程模型的区域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(1): 122−125, 130

    WANG L, QU C, ZHAO G D. Quantitative assessment of regional soil erosion based on Chinese soil loss equation model[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(1): 122−125, 130
    [25]
    胡昂, 吴俣思, 黄莹, 等. 高空间异质性区域生态系统服务供需与驱动力分析−以四川省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(5): 1062−1076

    HU A, WU Y S, HUANG Y, et al. Analysis of supplies, demands and driving forces of ecosystem services in regions with high spatial heterogeneity: a case study of Sichuan Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(5): 1062−1076
    [26]
    李仁杰, 郭风华, 安颖. 北京环城游憩地类型结构与自然要素的关系[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2010, 26(2): 103−106

    LI R J, GUO F H, AN Y. Relationship between the distribution of recreational region type around Beijing metropolises and some natural factors[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2010, 26(2): 103−106
    [27]
    王晓峰, 马雪, 冯晓明, 等. 重点脆弱生态区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系时空特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7344−7355

    WANG X F, MA X, FENG X M, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in key vulnerable ecological areas in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7344−7355
    [28]
    李峰, 刘军, 刘文龙, 等. 京津冀县域夜间灯光数据碳排放时空动态分析[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2021, 34(2): 230−236

    LI F, LIU J, LIU W L, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics analysis of carbon emissions from nighttime light data in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei counties[J]. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 34(2): 230−236
    [29]
    陶芹, 陶宇, 欧维新. 长三角地区休闲游憩服务供需关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(5): 1777−1785

    TAO Q, TAO Y, OU W X. Spatial variation of supply and demand relationships of recreational service in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(5): 1777−1785
    [30]
    LI J H, JIANG H W, BAI Y, et al. Indicators for spatial-temporal comparisons of ecosystem service status between regions: a case study of the Taihu River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60: 1008−1016 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.002
    [31]
    张蓬涛, 刘双嘉, 周智, 等. 京津冀地区生态系统服务供需测度及时空演变[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(9): 3354−3367

    ZHANG P T, LIU S J, ZHOU Z, et al. Supply and demand measurement and spatio-temporal evolution of ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 3354−3367
    [32]
    史德明, 梁音. 我国脆弱生态环境的评估与保护[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(1): 6−10 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2002.01.002

    SHI D M, LIANG Y. Evaluation and conservation of fragile ecological environment in China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002, 16(1): 6−10 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2002.01.002
    [33]
    傅伯杰, 陈利顶. 景观多样性的类型及其生态意义[J]. 地理学报, 1996, 51(5): 454−462

    FU B J, CHEN L D. Landscape diversity types and their ecological significance[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(5): 454−462
    [34]
    李苗苗, 吴炳方, 颜长珍, 等. 密云水库上游植被覆盖度的遥感估算[J]. 资源科学, 2004, 26(4): 153−159 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2004.04.022

    LI M M, WU B F, YAN C Z, et al. Estimation of vegetation fraction in the upper basin of Miyun Reservoir by remote sensing[J]. Resources Science, 2004, 26(4): 153−159 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2004.04.022
    [35]
    廖柳文, 秦建新, 刘永强, 等. 基于土地利用转型的湖南省生态弹性研究[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(9): 16−23

    LIAO L W, QIN J X, LIU Y Q, et al. Study on ecological elasticity of Hunan Province based on land use transition[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(9): 16−23
    [36]
    陈圣子, 周忠发, 闫利会. 基于网格 GIS 的喀斯特石漠化治理过程中生态系统健康变化诊断−以贵州花江示范区为例[J]. 中国岩溶, 2015, 34(3): 266−273

    CHEN S Z, ZHOU Z F, YAN L H. Diagnosis of ecosystem health change in governing Karst rocky desertification based on gridding GIS: a case in Huajiang demonstration area, Guizhou[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2015, 34(3): 266−273
    [37]
    王检萍, 余敦, 卢一乾, 等. 基于“三生”适宜性的县域土地利用冲突识别与分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(5): 1238−1251 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210512

    WANG J P, YU D, LU Y Q, et al. Recognition and analysis of land use conflicts at county level based on “Production-Living-Ecological” suitability[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(5): 1238−1251 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210512
    [38]
    张艺严, 张绍良, 杨永均, 等. 基于生态功能区尺度的社会-生态恢复力评价研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2022, 39(5): 1059−1068

    ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG S L, YANG Y J, et al. Assessment of social-ecological resilience based on the scale of ecological function area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2022, 39(5): 1059−1068
    [39]
    HUANG M D, XIAO Y, XU J E, et al. A review on the supply-demand relationship and spatial flows of ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022, 13(5): 925−935
    [40]
    LI X, SUN W, ZHANG D, et al. Evaluating water provision service at the sub-watershed scale by combining supply, demand, and spatial flow[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127: 107745 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107745
    [41]
    YAN Z, XIA L L, XIANG W N. Analyzing spatial patterns of urban carbon metabolism: a case study in Beijing, China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 130: 184−200 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.006
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 陶德凯，张子建. 江苏省国土空间绿色发展水平与生态系统服务耦合协同关系研究. 生态环境学报. 2025(02): 181-196 .
    2. 郭欣达，付奔，余思洁，侯鹰，陈卫平. 城市内涝和夏季高温风险评价与优先管控区识别方法研究. 生态环境学报. 2025(05): 731-742 .
    3. 骆畅，王方民，李高高，杨朝现. 山地多中心城市公园绿地生态系统文化服务供需匹配特征. 生态学报. 2024(13): 5816-5827 .
    4. 陈小平，邓亚宇，徐若凡，李萱，马航，武小钢，黄春波. 基于生态系统服务供需的太原市生态管理分区. 应用生态学报. 2024(07): 1925-1934 .
    5. 邓宗春，张姚，尹涛涛，许加田. 基于生态系统服务与生态敏感性评价的国土空间生态修复分区研究——以四川省白玉县为例. 资源与人居环境. 2024(05): 30-39 .
    6. 王冶，郭祖彬. 基于生态系统服务供需关系和土地利用程度耦合的生态分区识别与管理——以滦河流域为例. 草业科学. 2024(10): 2471-2486 .
    7. 蔡磊. 市域国土空间生态系统恢复力评价研究——以广东省云浮市为例. 乡村科技. 2024(22): 127-131 .

    Other cited types(10)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (581) PDF downloads (102) Cited by(17)

      冀ICP备05003362号-2

    Address：286 Huaizhong Road, Shijiazhuang 050022, China

    Tel：86-311-85818007E-mail：editor@sjziam.ac.cn

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return