裴冬, 王振华, 张喜英, 陈素英, 胡春胜. 井灌区节水农业技术集成综合示范节水效益评价——以河北省三河试区为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2006, 14(2): 180-184.
引用本文: 裴冬, 王振华, 张喜英, 陈素英, 胡春胜. 井灌区节水农业技术集成综合示范节水效益评价——以河北省三河试区为例[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2006, 14(2): 180-184.
PEI Dong, WANG Zhen-Hua, ZHANG Xi-Ying, CHEN Su-Ying, HU Chun-Sheng. Water-saving effect evaluation of agricultural synthetic technology in well-irrigation fields-A case study from Sanhe agricultural demonstrating fields, Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006, 14(2): 180-184.
Citation: PEI Dong, WANG Zhen-Hua, ZHANG Xi-Ying, CHEN Su-Ying, HU Chun-Sheng. Water-saving effect evaluation of agricultural synthetic technology in well-irrigation fields-A case study from Sanhe agricultural demonstrating fields, Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2006, 14(2): 180-184.

井灌区节水农业技术集成综合示范节水效益评价——以河北省三河试区为例

Water-saving effect evaluation of agricultural synthetic technology in well-irrigation fields-A case study from Sanhe agricultural demonstrating fields, Hebei Province

  • 摘要: 运用模糊评价方法评价河北省三河试区不同节水技术节水效益结果表明,从直接节水效果、所产生的经济效益和农民的认知程度以及适合当地情况方面综合评价,豌豆+春玉米得分最高,其次为春玉米和春玉米+冬小麦+夏玉米两年三熟制,综合节水模式Ⅲ和综合节水模式Ⅳ节水效益显著。适当调整结构能产生明显的直接节水效益,亦能产生良好的经济效益,简便易行,易为农民所接受。且应用综合节水措施(小畦灌溉+调亏灌溉制度+少免耕秸秆覆盖)效果优于单项节水措施。

     

    Abstract: Using the fuzzy evaluation method to Sanhe agricultural experiment fields, Hebei Province, the water-saving benefit was evaluated from three ways including direct water-saving effect, direct water-saving economic benefit and social influence. The results indicate that the pattern of pea+spring corn has the highest score,then the pattern of spring corn and spring corn+winter wheat+summer corn, the synthetic pattern Ⅲ and Ⅳ have obvious water-saving benefit. Appropriate adjustment of the agriculture structure can make obvious water-saving effect and economic effect. The results also show that the synthetic pattern(deficit irrigation into little fields+straw mulching+no-tillage)has better economic and water-saving benefit than the single patterns.

     

/

返回文章
返回