程博一, 韩艳娜, 李叶云, 江昌俊. 施肥模式对茶叶品质、产量构成及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2014, 22(5): 525-533. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.40081
引用本文: 程博一, 韩艳娜, 李叶云, 江昌俊. 施肥模式对茶叶品质、产量构成及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2014, 22(5): 525-533. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.40081
CHENG Boyi, HAN Yanna, LI Yeyun, JIANG Changjun. Effects of different fertilization patterns on soil nutrient, tea quality and yield components[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(5): 525-533. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.40081
Citation: CHENG Boyi, HAN Yanna, LI Yeyun, JIANG Changjun. Effects of different fertilization patterns on soil nutrient, tea quality and yield components[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(5): 525-533. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2014.40081

施肥模式对茶叶品质、产量构成及土壤肥力的影响

Effects of different fertilization patterns on soil nutrient, tea quality and yield components

  • 摘要: 采用田间试验, 比较分析了撒施、沟施和沟施覆膜3种施肥模式及沟施覆膜下氮肥施用量对茶叶品质成分、产量构成因子和茶园土壤肥力状况的影响。结果表明: 沟施覆膜在一定程度上增加了茶叶产量并改善了品质, 提高了茶园土壤的基本肥力状况, 沟施次之, 撒施效果最差。与沟施相比, 沟施覆膜下茶叶的水浸出物、咖啡碱、游离氨基酸含量分别提升2.24%、7.26%、14.68%, 茶多酚下降1.88%, 芽叶密度、芽叶长度分别提升8.50%、8.15%; 土壤表层和深层pH分别下降8.16%和5.30%, 表层有机质、全氮、速效氮、速效磷、速效钾分别提升10.87%、26.74%、17.95%、34.69%、25.42%, 深层有机质、全氮、速效氮、速效磷、速效钾分别提升10.38%、28.22%、25.64%、15.34%、17.97%。比较沟施覆膜下45 kg·hm-2、60 kg·hm-2、75 kg·hm-2、90 kg·hm-2 4种施氮量对茶叶品质、产量构成以及土壤肥力提高的效果, 结果表明随着施氮量的增加, 茶叶品质及产量构成和茶园土壤肥力增加, 但施氮75 kg·hm-2与90 kg·hm-2处理的茶叶品质及产量构成因子间差异不显著, 说明沟施覆膜条件下施氮肥75 kg·hm-2即可满足茶园生产需求。

     

    Abstract: To determine the fertilization efficiency under different fertilization modes and fertilization rates of tea garden, a field test was conducted to study the effects of different fertilization practices on soil fertility, and tea quality and yield components. Three fertilization modes were set up - broadcast fertilization, furrow fertilization and furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching. Five fertilization rates were designed under furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching, which were zero fertilization (CK), 45 kg(N)·hm-2, 60 kg(N)·hm-2, 75 kg(N)·hm-2, 90 kg(N)·hm-2. The results showed that in terms of soil fertility and tea yield components and quality, furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching was better than furrow fertilization. Furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching improved both the quality and yield of tea and it also enhanced to a certain extent soil nutrient in the tea garden. Broadcast fertilization had the worst effects on soil fertility and tea yield components and quality. Compared with furrow fertilization, furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching increased tea water extract, caffeine and free amino acids contents by 2.24%, 7.26%, 14.68%. Also, it increased the bud leaf density and length by 8.50% and 8.15%, respectively. Then organic matter, total nitrogen, available N, P and K respectively improved by 10.87%, 26.74%, 17.95%, 34.69%, 25.42% in surface soil and by 10.38%, 28.22%, 25.64%, 15.34%, 17.97% in subsurface soil under furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching. Contrarily, tea polyphenols decreased by 1.88% and pH by 8.16% and 5.30% in surface and subsurface soils, respectively. Comparison of the effects of different nitrogen doses under furrow fertilization with plastic-film mulching showed that the tea quality and yield components increased with increasing nitrogen dosage. However, the differences in the effects of 75 kg·hm-2 and 90 kg·hm-2 treatments were not significant in terms of tea quality and yield components. Thus under plastic-film mulching, furrow nitrogen fertilization at 75 kg·hm-2 was an enough dosage for efficient tea garden production management.

     

/

返回文章
返回