王书伟, 林静慧, 吴正贵, 陈吉, 潘云俊, 盛雪雯. 氮肥深施对太湖地区稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(12): 2002−2012. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210119
引用本文: 王书伟, 林静慧, 吴正贵, 陈吉, 潘云俊, 盛雪雯. 氮肥深施对太湖地区稻田氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(12): 2002−2012. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210119
WANG S W, LIN J H, WU Z G, CHEN J, PAN Y J, SHENG X W. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer deep placement on the ammonia volatilization from paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(12): 2002−2012. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210119
Citation: WANG S W, LIN J H, WU Z G, CHEN J, PAN Y J, SHENG X W. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer deep placement on the ammonia volatilization from paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(12): 2002−2012. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.210119

氮肥深施对太湖地区稻田氨挥发的影响

The effects of nitrogen fertilizer deep placement on the ammonia volatilization from paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region of China

  • 摘要: NH3挥发是稻田氮素损失的重要途径之一, 基于基肥期尿素氮肥深施、追肥期用缓释肥替代尿素和配施脲酶抑制剂对太湖地区水稻生长季NH3挥发影响少有报道。为此, 本研究共设置了7个原位试验处理: 1)空白处理, 不施氮肥(CK); 2)当地常规氮肥表施处理, 施氮量300 kg∙hm−2 (SN300); 3)减氮10%, 氮肥表施处理, 施氮量为270 kg∙hm−2 (SN270); 4)减氮10%+基肥氮深施+追肥表施尿素处理(DN270); 5)减氮10%+基肥氮深施+追肥表施尿素+脲酶抑制剂(DN270+UI); 6)减氮10%+基肥氮深施+追肥表施缓释肥(DN270+SR); 7)减氮10%+基肥深施+追肥表施缓释肥+脲酶抑制剂(DN270+SR+UI)。与常规尿素表施SN300处理NH3累积排放量相比, 采用基肥深施可降低78.2%~85.2%的基肥期NH3排放量, 基肥减氮深施且追肥期配施脲酶抑制剂(DN270+UI处理)可降低30.4%的分蘖肥期NH3排放量和25.3%的穗肥期NH3排放量, 基肥减氮深施且水稻追肥期用缓释肥替代尿素(DN270+SR处理)可降低36.4%的分蘖肥期NH3排放量和28.1%的穗肥期NH3排放量。整个水稻生长季NH3累积排放量大小为SN300>SN270>DN270>DN270+UI>DN270+SR>DN270+SR+UI, 其中DN270+SR+UI处理下NH3排放量最小, 与SN300处理相比, 可显著降低50.9%的NH3累积排放量(P<0.05)。除CK外, 各处理间水稻产量差异不显著, 单位水稻产量NH3排放强度以DN270+SR+UI处理下最小, 与SN300处理相比, 可显著降低52.5%单位水稻产量氨排放强度(P<0.05)。综合考虑经济生态环境效益, 在南方典型稻田中采用基肥期尿素深施可有效地降低氨挥发量, 是一种值得推广的稻田氨减排模式, 在追肥期用缓释肥替代尿素同时配施脲酶抑制剂可进一步提高NH3减排效果。

     

    Abstract: .Ammonia (NH3) volatilization is an important nitrogen (N) loss pathway in paddy fields. However, the effects of N fertilizer deep placement, slow-release N fertilizers, and urea inhibitors on NH3 volatilization reduction during the entire rice-growing season remain uncertain. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted a field experiment with seven treatments: (1) no N application, (2) local broadcasting application of urea at a rate of 300 kg(N)∙hm−2 (SN300), (3) 10% reduction of N from SN300 (SN270), (4) deep placement of basal urea together with the broadcasting of topdressing of urea at tiller and panicle stages of rice, at a total a rate of 270 kg(N)∙hm−2 (DN270), (5) application of urea inhibitor for DN270 (DN270+UI), (6) 10% nitrogen reduction, deep application of basal urea together with the surface application of slow-release N fertilizer (DN270+SR), and (7) application of urease inhibitors for DN270+SR (DN270+SR+UI). Compared with the SN300 treatment, deep placement of basal N fertilizer reduced the cumulative NH3 emissions by 78.2%−85.2% in the basal fertilization period. The combined application of the urease inhibitors in the rice topdressing periods (DN270+UI treatment) reduced the NH3 emissions by 30.4% at the tillering stage and 25.3% at the panicle stage in comparison with the SN300 treatment. Replacing urea with a slow-release N fertilizer (DN270+SR treatment) in the rice topdressing periods reduced NH3 volatilization by 36.4% at the tillering stage and 28.1% at the panicle stage. The cumulative NH3 volatilization changed in the following order: SN300 > SN270 > DN270 > DN270+UI > DN270+SR > DN270+SR+UI. Compared to the local treatment (SN300), DN270+SR+UI significantly reduced NH3 volatilization by 50.9%. There was no significant difference in rice yield among the N fertilizer treatments. NH3 emission intensity per unit rice yield was lowest for the DN270+SR+UI treatment, 52.5% lower than the SN300 treatment. Overall, simultaneous N fertilizer deep placement with slow-release N and urease inhibitors produced more grains with lower environmental costs associated with NH3 emissions. This represents a promising and sustainable management strategy for paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region of China.

     

/

返回文章
返回