崔峰, 尚久杨. 中国农业文化遗产研究的文献计量与知识图谱分析——基于中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science数据库[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(9): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200370
引用本文: 崔峰, 尚久杨. 中国农业文化遗产研究的文献计量与知识图谱分析——基于中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science数据库[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(9): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200370
CUI Feng, SHANG Jiuyang. Bibliometrics and knowledge-mapping analysis of progress in agricultural heritage research in China: Based on the China Knowledge Network and Web of Science databases[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(9): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200370
Citation: CUI Feng, SHANG Jiuyang. Bibliometrics and knowledge-mapping analysis of progress in agricultural heritage research in China: Based on the China Knowledge Network and Web of Science databases[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(9): 1294-1304. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200370

中国农业文化遗产研究的文献计量与知识图谱分析——基于中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science数据库

Bibliometrics and knowledge-mapping analysis of progress in agricultural heritage research in China: Based on the China Knowledge Network and Web of Science databases

  • 摘要: 自联合国粮农组织(FAO)启动“全球重要农业文化遗产(GIAHS)”保护项目以来,学术界对农业文化遗产研究的关注度不断提高。为系统考察和直观反映中国农业文化遗产研究的现状、热点和前沿,以“农业文化遗产”为主题,基于中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science数据库,筛选出2006—2019年相关文献共240篇进行文献计量和知识图谱分析。结果表明:2006—2019年,中国农业文化遗产研究大体经历了初步探索、快速增长和平稳发展3个阶段。在刊文载体上,已形成由《中国农史》《中国农业大学学报》《资源科学》《中国生态农业学报》《Journal of Resources and Ecology》等8种期刊组成的核心期刊群;在研究机构上,以中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所、南京农业大学等为代表的科研院所占据重要地位;在发文作者上,以闵庆文、王思明及其团队为引领而取得的成果最为丰硕;在研究内容上,多侧重于农业文化遗产的保护利用、旅游开发、价值评价等方面;在研究案例选择上,主要集中于拥有全球及中国重要农业文化遗产的云南、浙江、江苏、贵州、广西等省;在研究方法上,仍以个案分析、定性分析居多。今后应继续深化农业文化遗产概念、分类、保护机制与模式等基础理论研究;拓展农业文化遗产时空动态演变、监测预警机制构建、经济—社会—文化—生态环境效应评估等新领域研究;主动对接国家重大战略需求,加强“一带一路”、大运河、黄河流域、长江经济带等重点区域农业文化遗产研究;不断拓宽研究视野,推进多学科理论、方法、技术集成和综合应用,打造农业文化遗产研究多元融合共同体。

     

    Abstract: Since initiation of the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) conservation program by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), academic communities have begun to focus more research efforts on agricultural heritage. The present study searched the China Knowledge Network (CNKI) and Web of Science databases for "agricultural heritage" studies published from 2006 to 2019 and analyzed 240 relevant articles using bibliometrics and knowledge mapping. From 2006 to 2019, researches of Chinese agricultural heritage had progressed in three stages: initial exploration, rapid growth, and steady development. In regard to journal carriers, a core group was formed of eight journals, which included "Agricultural History of China" "China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition" "Resources Science" "Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture", and "Journal of Resources and Ecology". The Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Nanjing Agricultural University, for example, played important roles in academic research. And MIN Qingwen, WANG Siming, and their team members were among the most prolific authors. Meanwhile, agricultural heritage conservation and utilization, tourism development, and value assessment were the most common research focuses; and case studies were mainly concentrated in Yunnan, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Guizhou, Guangxi, and other provinces with globally and nationally important agricultural heritage systems. In respect to research methods, case studies and qualitative analysis were the most common. In the future, researchers should 1) continue to perform basic theoretical studies about the definition, classification, conservation mechanisms, and patterns of agricultural heritage; 2) develop new areas of agricultural heritage research, including investigation of its spatial and temporal evolution, development of monitoring and warning mechanisms, and assessment of economic-social-cultural-ecological environmental effects; 3) strengthen the research on agricultural heritage of key regions (e.g., "the Belt and Road" "the Grand Canal" "the Yellow River Basin", and "the Yangtze River Economic Belt") to meet the significant national strategic development needs; and 4) broaden research horizons by facilitating the integration of multidisciplinary theories, methods, technologies, and comprehensive applications and by establishing integrated agricultural heritage research communities.

     

/

返回文章
返回