张露荷, 陈佰鸿, 王延秀, 徐巨涛, 毛娟, 党兆霞. 不同间伐方式对密植苹果园生理生态的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2015, 23(11): 1394-1403. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150383
引用本文: 张露荷, 陈佰鸿, 王延秀, 徐巨涛, 毛娟, 党兆霞. 不同间伐方式对密植苹果园生理生态的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2015, 23(11): 1394-1403. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150383
ZHANG Luhe, CHEN Baihong, WANG Yanxiu, XU Jutao, MAO Juan, DANG Zhaoxia. Effects of different thinning methods on ecophysiology of dense apple orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(11): 1394-1403. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150383
Citation: ZHANG Luhe, CHEN Baihong, WANG Yanxiu, XU Jutao, MAO Juan, DANG Zhaoxia. Effects of different thinning methods on ecophysiology of dense apple orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(11): 1394-1403. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150383

不同间伐方式对密植苹果园生理生态的影响

Effects of different thinning methods on ecophysiology of dense apple orchard

  • 摘要: 为了选择最适宜黄土高原成龄‘红富士’苹果郁闭园采用的间伐方式, 本文以18年生‘红富士’苹果树为试验材料, 研究了隔行间伐(T1)、隔株间伐(T2)、隔2伐1(T3)等3种间伐方式对‘红富士’果园光照分布、叶片质量、叶片结构、果实分布、品质、产量及效益等的影响。结果表明: 与未间伐对照(CK)相比, T1、T2和T3间伐方式株间透光率分别提高108.59%、191.98%和57.45%, 行间透光率分别提高259.20%、220.11%和64.86%, 冠下透光率分别提高102.80%、155.32%和37.43%, 树冠光合有效辐射分别提高38.02%、45.18%和18.43%, 单果重分别提高25.03%、34.83%和9.81%, 着色指数分别提高6.00%、6.26%和3.30%, 可溶性糖含量分别提高35.98%、39.14%和22.98%, 果皮花青苷含量分别提高104.41%、101.47%和30.88%, 可滴定酸含量分别降低15.38%、23.08%和17.95%。间伐有效改善了叶片的质量与结构, T1和T2显著提高了叶片的厚度、叶绿素含量、氮含量和钾含量; T2提高叶片的叶绿素a、叶绿素b和类胡萝卜素含量的幅度最大; T2的叶片栅栏组织较其他处理的排列更整齐紧密。T1、T2及T3每公顷产量分别下降7 601.89 kg、5 219.45 kg及6 056.80 kg, 但其产值分别增加14 959.54元、34 363.70元及9 081.13元, T2增加幅度最大, 是郁闭果园改造的首选间伐方式。

     

    Abstract: In order to choose optimum thinning method of closed and matured ‘Red Fuji’ orchards in the Loess Plateau, 18-year old ‘Red Fuji’ apple trees in Qingyang County, Gansu Province, were used to study the effects of three thinning methods — interlaced thinning (T1), septum strain thinning (T2) and cutting one for every 3-tree (T3) — on orchard light distribution, leaf quality, leaf structure, fruit distribution and quality, and yield and economics of apple trees. The results showed that thinning methods significantly decreased orchard coverage rate, with 22.01%, 18.01% and 10.14% decrease under T1, T2 and T3, compared with the control (CK). The transmittance between plants in a line under T1, T2 and T3 treatments increased by 108.59%, 191.98% and 57.45%, respectively, compared with the control (CK). The transmittance between lines increased 259.20%, 220.11% and 64.86%, respectively. Transmittance under crown increased respectively by 102.80%, 155.32% and 37.43%. Canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) increased respectively by 38.02%, 45.18% and 18.43%. PAR three dimension distributions of apple trees under T1 and T2 was better than under CK and T3 treatment, PAR of T2 treatment was improved more obvious. Also thinning methods effectively improved the structure of apple leaf. T1 and T2 significantly increased upper epidermis thickness of leaves inside canopy and palisade tissue thickness of all leaves, while T3 significantly increased lower epidermis thickness of leaves inside and outside canopy. Under T2 treatment, leaf palisade tissues were more tidily and closely arranged than under other treatments. Leaves quality was significantly changed under different thinning methods. Leaf chlorophyll, N and K contents were increased in 3 thinning methods treatments. T2 was the best in terms of increase in the contents of cChlorophyll a, cChlorophyll b and carotenoids. Single fruit weight increased by 25.03%, 34.83% and 9.81%, fruit color index increased by 6.00%, 6.26% and 3.30%, soluble sugar content increased by 35.98%, 39.14% and 22.98%, and peel anthocyanin content increased by 104.41%, 101.47% and 30.88%, while titratable acid content decreased by 15.38%, 23.08% and 17.95%, respectively, under T1, T2 and T3 conditions, compared with CK.. Under CK treatment, there was not fruit in positon 0.5 m away from stem, most fruits were 2 m away from stem and 3 m high, showing outside moving of fruit-setting position. Under thinning conditions, fruits in inside canopy and in lower canopy increased. Despite yield per hectare under T1, T2 and T3 treatments decreased by 7 601.89 kg, 5 219.45 kg and 6 056.80 kg, respectively, orchard productivity value per hectare increased by 14 959.54 Yuan, 34 363.70 Yuan and 9 081.13 Yuan.

     

/

返回文章
返回