舒园, 居静, 赵海涛, 郝彦宾, 李林峰. 干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫的相互作用[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(12): 1891−1899. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220140
引用本文: 舒园, 居静, 赵海涛, 郝彦宾, 李林峰. 干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫的相互作用[J]. 中国生态农业学报 (中英文), 2022, 30(12): 1891−1899. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220140
SHU Y, JU J, ZHAO H T, HAO Y B, LI L F. Plant mediated interaction between aboveground and underground herbivores under drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(12): 1891−1899. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220140
Citation: SHU Y, JU J, ZHAO H T, HAO Y B, LI L F. Plant mediated interaction between aboveground and underground herbivores under drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(12): 1891−1899. DOI: 10.12357/cjea.20220140

干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫的相互作用

Plant mediated interaction between aboveground and underground herbivores under drought stress

  • 摘要: 全球气候变化下的营养级相互作用对生态系统的影响至关重要, 尤其以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫之间的相互作用在植食性昆虫和多营养级群落中占有重要地位。此外由于全球气候变化, 干旱事件出现的频率和强度极有可能增加, 因此研究干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫之间的相互作用, 对预测全球气候变化对生态系统的影响极其必要。本文通过查阅大量相关研究文献发现: 1)当前气候下地上与地下植食性昆虫的相互作用主要是建立在“植物胁迫假说”和“防御诱导假说”上, 并通过植食性昆虫到达寄主植物的顺序、植食性昆虫性能参数、植物生活史以及植食性昆虫的类型影响地上和地下植食性昆虫相互作用; 2)干旱胁迫对植物的影响建立在“生长-分化”假说上, 目前这一理论得到了一定支持; 3)干旱胁迫可引起植物生理的改变从而影响植物与地上食叶昆虫(咀嚼类、刺吸式)间的相互关系; 4)干旱胁迫下植物与地下食根昆虫的相互研究较少, 目前仅有的研究认为干旱与地下食根昆虫造成的植物根系伤害可能是叠加的; 5)干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫之间的相互作用可能受到植食性昆虫种类, 植物种类, 植物防御化合物的类型、浓度和分布, 植物激素, 植物适口性, 植物群落以及生境等的影响; 6)今后关于干旱胁迫下以植物为介导的地上和地下植食性昆虫相互作用的研究还需进一步缩小试验局限性: 如长期实地试验, 扩大试验范围(如纳入更多植物以及植食性昆虫种类等), 创新试验方法等充分探讨相互作用之间的主导机制。

     

    Abstract: With global climate change, the frequency and intensity of drought events may increase. Therefore, it is crucial to predict the net impact of global climate change on ecosystems by studying the interaction between aboveground and underground phytophagous insects mediated by plants under drought stress. Based on the findings from an extensive literature review, we found that: 1) The interaction between aboveground and underground phytophagous insects in recent climate is mainly based on the “plant stress hypothesis” and “defense induction hypothesis” and the interaction between aboveground and underground phytophagous insects is affected by the order of phytophagous insects arriving at the host plant, performance parameters of phytophagous insects, life history of plants, and types of phytophagous insects. 2) The effect of drought stress on plants is based on the hypothesis of “growth differentiation” which has been corroborated to some extent. 3) Drought stress can cause changes in plant physiology, thereby affecting the relationship between plants and aboveground leaf-eating insects (chewing insects, stinging insects). 4) Few studies have examined the interaction between plants and underground root-eating insects under drought stress. At present, few studies suggest that the damage to plant roots caused by drought and underground root-eating insects may be superimposed. 5) The interaction between aboveground and underground phytophagous insects mediated by plants under drought stress may be affected by phytophagous insect species; plant species; type, concentration, and distribution of plant defense compounds; plant hormones; plant palatability; plant communities; and habitats. 6) In the future, research on plant-mediated aboveground and underground phytophagous insect interactions under drought stress needs to further reduce experimental limitations, for example, long-term field experiments, expanding the scope of experiments (including more plants and phytophagous insect species), innovative experimental methods, and evaluation of the dominant mechanism between interactions.

     

/

返回文章
返回